From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.ilvokhin.com (mail.ilvokhin.com [178.62.254.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A438625B2FA for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 11:36:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.62.254.231 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775734611; cv=none; b=FBQ/PaFPvm0Xzmq6f7csozS7PiGxFkkCgcF7V2yNxpVux0DgHOvf75EEIYsurfYCYhlFUte0kZCTqmyZJTw7KbgKhQW+x6mk3xE69BKqIxr0eJswH8xTwDMEneQ5VNte3vBSc7+C1i8N0X8R37YrOCc1g03I70zX17i678sJdHA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775734611; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bcdYcJNkFyCTbSIbB1F0TdmwwblO2vY6kDuSHYLTkpw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GoGc/YPqATaeG+7pTlHIDYqY9msJYR3yZtP1DHh50nvEHZZGyDUgew0ShrIp3VADncswE2jLfriP9WpEMbC6rGCWM9EbHNPZOhtH0jH/PA3FU8DvMgQs4L2661mJ7tZ+XE50gHOTZQak968fC3oU/7O2fxRWNLptNEMHcRTHaYg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=ilvokhin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ilvokhin.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ilvokhin.com header.i=@ilvokhin.com header.b=Co6DXJZx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.62.254.231 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=ilvokhin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ilvokhin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ilvokhin.com header.i=@ilvokhin.com header.b="Co6DXJZx" Received: from shell.ilvokhin.com (shell.ilvokhin.com [138.68.190.75]) (Authenticated sender: d@ilvokhin.com) by mail.ilvokhin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 713A6BE7A5; Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:36:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ilvokhin.com; s=mail; t=1775734607; bh=RbkflGjGu8BF8nS6s790ufgH6Ojdrqp4tFiwDkoaxz0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Co6DXJZxLdh7H45ycK5MQG1F61S4xOokD/ug2AtnVTmrVeK0RqaXhRb6jgc5zGppy Jpfz0Q1F30rdiAcF2fG/eVu0ieuEZnjNOxukLHDs4cGwrNK5hbgfGR8s5kihyaCM+o TfQ6CDpoSzNNjSdW0H/+QqpxBnE9EyPgFTYyl5DA= Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2026 11:36:43 +0000 From: Dmitry Ilvokhin To: Andrew Morton Cc: Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , Suren Baghdasaryan , Brendan Jackman , Johannes Weiner , Zi Yan , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/8] mm: use spinlock guards for zone lock Message-ID: References: <20260408130715.d6772b9675b0182bac9fe427@linux-foundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260408130715.d6772b9675b0182bac9fe427@linux-foundation.org> On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 01:07:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 8 Apr 2026 18:42:16 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > Dmitry Ilvokhin (8): > > > mm: use zone lock guard in reserve_highatomic_pageblock() > > > mm: use zone lock guard in unset_migratetype_isolate() > > > mm: use zone lock guard in unreserve_highatomic_pageblock() > > > mm: use zone lock guard in set_migratetype_isolate() > > > mm: use zone lock guard in take_page_off_buddy() > > > mm: use zone lock guard in put_page_back_buddy() > > > mm: use zone lock guard in free_pcppages_bulk() > > > mm: use zone lock guard in __offline_isolated_pages() > > > > > > mm/page_alloc.c | 53 ++++++++++++----------------------- > > > mm/page_isolation.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- > > > 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-) > > > > I like the resulting code. For the whole series. > > Acked-by: Michal Hocko > > Thanks. > > As I mentioned previously, the outcome here hinges on how the > developers who work on this code feel about using guard(). Most of > them are in hiding at present but that's OK - it's post -rc1 fun. > Thanks, Andrew. Understood. I'll wait for feedback from more folks. Hopefully they reappear soon after the -rc1 dust settles.