From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
leo.yan@linux.dev, Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Zecheng Li <zli94@ncsu.edu>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support load instruction tracking
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2026 23:23:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adiXYBhkEpbBR0ZA@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403094800.1418825-10-wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 09:47:53AM +0000, Tengda Wu wrote:
> Implement update_insn_state() for arm64 to track register state changes
> during load (LDR) instructions. This is essential for maintaining accurate
> type information when data is moved from memory to registers.
>
> The implementation handles the three primary arm64 addressing modes:
> 1. Signed offset: [base, #imm]
> 2. Pre-index: [base, #imm]!
> 3. Post-index: [base], #imm
>
> Introduce adjust_reg_index_state() to handle the side effects of pre-index
> and post-index addressing, where the base register is updated with the
> offset after or before the memory access. This ensures that the register's
> offset within a structure is correctly tracked across sequential
> instructions.
>
> A real-world example is shown below:
>
> ffff80008011f5b0 <pick_task_stop>:
> ffff80008011f5b8: ldr x0, [x0, #2712] // x0: struct rq* -> task_struct*
> ffff80008011f5c0: ldr w1, [x0, #104] // PMU sample at offset 0x68
>
> Before this commit, the type of x0 was incorrectly inferred as 'struct rq':
>
> find data type for 0x68(reg0) at pick_task_stop+0x10
> var [8] reg0 offset 0 type='struct rq*'
> chk [10] reg0 offset=0x68 ok=1 kind=1 (struct rq*) : Good!
> final result: type='struct rq'
>
> After this commit, the type of x0 is correctly inferred as 'struct task_struct':
>
> find data type for 0x68(reg0) at pick_task_stop+0x10
> var [8] reg0 offset 0 type='struct rq*'
> ldr [8] 0xa98(reg0) -> reg0 type='struct task_struct*'
> chk [10] reg0 offset=0x68 ok=1 kind=1 (struct task_struct*) : Good!
> final result: type='struct task_struct'
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
> ---
> .../perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c
> index 1fe4c503431b..cac2bf0021c9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
> #include <regex.h>
> #include "../annotate.h"
> #include "../disasm.h"
> +#include "../annotate-data.h"
> +#include "../debug.h"
>
> struct arch_arm64 {
> struct arch arch;
> @@ -254,6 +256,88 @@ static int extract_op_location_arm64(const struct arch *arch,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBDW_SUPPORT
> +static int get_mem_offset(struct annotated_op_loc *op_loc, int type_offset)
> +{
> + if (op_loc->addr_mode == INSN_ADDR_POST_INDEX)
> + return type_offset;
> +
> + return op_loc->offset + type_offset;
> +}
> +
> +static void adjust_reg_index_state(struct type_state *state, int reg,
> + struct annotated_op_loc *op_loc,
> + const char *insn_name, u32 insn_offset)
> +{
> + struct type_state_reg *tsr;
> +
> + if (!has_reg_type(state, reg) ||
> + (op_loc->addr_mode != INSN_ADDR_PRE_INDEX &&
> + op_loc->addr_mode != INSN_ADDR_POST_INDEX))
> + return;
> +
> + tsr = &state->regs[reg];
> + tsr->offset = op_loc->offset + tsr->offset;
> + tsr->ok = true;
Maybe we can skip setting 'ok' here?
> +
> + pr_debug_dtp("%s [%x] %s-index %#x(reg%d) -> reg%d", insn_name,
> + insn_offset, op_loc->addr_mode == INSN_ADDR_PRE_INDEX ?
> + "pre" : "post", op_loc->offset, reg, reg);
> + pr_debug_type_name(&tsr->type, tsr->kind);
> +}
> +
> +static void update_insn_state_arm64(struct type_state *state,
> + struct data_loc_info *dloc, Dwarf_Die * cu_die __maybe_unused,
> + struct disasm_line *dl)
> +{
> + struct annotated_insn_loc loc;
> + struct annotated_op_loc *src = &loc.ops[INSN_OP_SOURCE];
> + struct annotated_op_loc *dst = &loc.ops[INSN_OP_TARGET];
> + struct type_state_reg *tsr;
> + Dwarf_Die type_die;
> + u32 insn_offset = dl->al.offset;
> + int sreg, dreg;
> +
> + if (annotate_get_insn_location(dloc->arch, dl, &loc) < 0)
> + return;
> +
> + sreg = src->reg1;
> + dreg = dst->reg1;
> +
> + /* Memory to register transfers */
> + if (!strncmp(dl->ins.name, "ld", 2)) {
> + struct type_state_reg dst_tsr;
> +
> + if (!has_reg_type(state, sreg) ||
> + !has_reg_type(state, dreg) ||
> + !state->regs[dreg].ok)
> + return;
I think we should set state->regs[sreg].ok to false if sreg is valid.
> +
> + tsr = &state->regs[sreg];
> + tsr->copied_from = -1;
> + dst_tsr = state->regs[dreg];
> +
> + /* Dereference the pointer if it has one */
> + if (dst_tsr.kind == TSR_KIND_TYPE &&
> + die_deref_ptr_type(&dst_tsr.type,
> + get_mem_offset(dst, dst_tsr.offset),
> + &type_die)) {
> + tsr->type = type_die;
> + tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_TYPE;
> + tsr->offset = 0;
> + tsr->ok = true;
> +
> + pr_debug_dtp("ldr [%x] %#x(reg%d) -> reg%d",
> + insn_offset, dst->offset, dreg, sreg);
It could confuse people since src and dst are opposite. Maybe you can
change the parse function to set the source and target (destination)
properly for each instruction.
> + pr_debug_type_name(&tsr->type, tsr->kind);
> +
> + adjust_reg_index_state(state, dreg, dst, "ldr", insn_offset);
> + }
Also you will need to update index offset and set the 'ok' state
properly.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> + return;
> + }
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> const struct arch *arch__new_arm64(const struct e_machine_and_e_flags *id,
> const char *cpuid __maybe_unused)
> {
> @@ -273,6 +357,9 @@ const struct arch *arch__new_arm64(const struct e_machine_and_e_flags *id,
> arch->objdump.imm_char = '#';
> arch->associate_instruction_ops = arm64__associate_instruction_ops;
> arch->extract_op_location = extract_op_location_arm64;
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBDW_SUPPORT
> + arch->update_insn_state = update_insn_state_arm64;
> +#endif
>
> /* bl, blr */
> err = regcomp(&arm->call_insn, "^blr?$", REG_EXTENDED);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-03 9:47 [PATCH v2 00/16] perf arm64: Support data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] perf llvm: Fix arm64 adrp instruction disassembly mismatch with objdump Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] perf capstone: Fix arm64 jump/adrp " Tengda Wu
2026-04-07 6:43 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-10 9:08 ` Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] perf annotate-arm64: Generalize arm64_mov__parse to support standard operands Tengda Wu
2026-04-07 6:58 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-10 10:06 ` Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] perf annotate-arm64: Handle load and store instructions Tengda Wu
2026-04-07 7:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-10 10:16 ` Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] perf annotate: Introduce extract_op_location callback for arch-specific parsing Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] perf dwarf-regs: Adapt get_dwarf_regnum() for arm64 Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] perf annotate-arm64: Implement extract_op_location() callback Tengda Wu
2026-04-07 7:26 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-10 10:27 ` Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] perf annotate-arm64: Enable instruction tracking support Tengda Wu
2026-04-10 6:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-10 10:29 ` Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support load instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-04-10 6:23 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2026-04-10 10:37 ` Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support store " Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support stack variable tracking Tengda Wu
2026-04-10 6:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-10 10:41 ` Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mov' instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-04-10 6:39 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-10 10:53 ` Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'add' " Tengda Wu
2026-04-10 6:42 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-10 10:49 ` Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'adrp' instruction to track global variables Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support per-cpu variable access tracking Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:48 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mrs' instruction to track 'current' pointer Tengda Wu
2026-04-10 6:52 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-10 10:44 ` Tengda Wu
2026-04-07 6:31 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] perf arm64: Support data type profiling Namhyung Kim
2026-04-08 11:35 ` Tengda Wu
2026-04-10 7:00 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-10 8:17 ` Tengda Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adiXYBhkEpbBR0ZA@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@arm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
--cc=lihuafei1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wutengda@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=zli94@ncsu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox