From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
leo.yan@linux.dev, Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Zecheng Li <zli94@ncsu.edu>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mov' instruction tracking
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2026 23:39:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adibGCaruYl4i9f8@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403094800.1418825-13-wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 09:47:56AM +0000, Tengda Wu wrote:
> Extend update_insn_state() for arm64 to handle register-to-register
> 'mov' instructions.
>
> When a 'mov' instruction occurs between two registers, the data type
> information (DWARF type, kind, and offset) needs to be propagated from
> the source register to the destination register. This ensures that if
> a pointer or a structure was previously identified in one register,
> the tracker continues to recognize it after it is moved.
>
> A real-world example is shown below:
>
> ffff8000803eebf8 <get_vma_policy>:
> ffff8000803eec20: mov x21, x0 // x0 (struct vm_area_struct*) -> x21
> ffff8000803eec28: ldr x2, [x0, #112]
> ffff8000803eec2c: cbz x2, ffff8000803eec94 <get_vma_policy+0x9c>
> ffff8000803eec94: ldr x0, [x21, #152] // PMU sample
>
> Before this commit, the type of x21 was unknown, causing the subsequent
> inference to fail:
>
> var [0] reg0 offset 0 type='struct vm_area_struct*' size=0x8
> chk [9c] reg21 offset=0x98 ok=0 kind=0 cfa : no type information
> final result: no type information
>
> After this commit, the type of x21 is correctly inferred as 'vm_area_struct':
>
> var [0] reg0 offset 0 type='struct vm_area_struct*' size=0x8
> mov [28] reg0 -> reg21 type='struct vm_area_struct*' size=0x8
> chk [9c] reg21 offset=0x98 ok=1 kind=1 (struct vm_area_struct*) : Good!
> found by insn track: 0x98(reg21) type-offset=0x98
> final result: type='struct vm_area_struct' size=0xb0
>
> Signed-off-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
> ---
> .../perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c
> index f9100230c2f6..013b673f4861 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c
> @@ -308,6 +308,34 @@ static void update_insn_state_arm64(struct type_state *state,
> sreg = src->reg1;
> dreg = dst->reg1;
>
> + /* Register to register transfers */
> + if (!strcmp(dl->ins.name, "mov")) {
> + if (!has_reg_type(state, sreg))
> + return;
> +
> + tsr = &state->regs[sreg];
> + tsr->copied_from = -1;
> +
> + if (!has_reg_type(state, dreg) ||
> + !state->regs[dreg].ok) {
> + tsr->ok = false;
> + return;
> + }
Does this handle an immediate value?
> +
> + tsr->type = state->regs[dreg].type;
> + tsr->kind = state->regs[dreg].kind;
> + tsr->offset = state->regs[dreg].offset;
> + tsr->ok = true;
Probably safe to use 'state->regs[dreg].ok'.
Anyway, the same concern. The src and dst are reversed.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> +
> + if (tsr->kind == TSR_KIND_TYPE || tsr->kind == TSR_KIND_POINTER)
> + tsr->copied_from = dreg;
> +
> + pr_debug_dtp("mov [%x] reg%d -> reg%d",
> + insn_offset, dreg, sreg);
> + pr_debug_type_name(&tsr->type, tsr->kind);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if (dloc->fb_cfa) {
> u64 ip = dloc->ms->sym->start + dl->al.offset;
> u64 pc = map__rip_2objdump(dloc->ms->map, ip);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-03 9:47 [PATCH v2 00/16] perf arm64: Support data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] perf llvm: Fix arm64 adrp instruction disassembly mismatch with objdump Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] perf capstone: Fix arm64 jump/adrp " Tengda Wu
2026-04-07 6:43 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-10 9:08 ` Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] perf annotate-arm64: Generalize arm64_mov__parse to support standard operands Tengda Wu
2026-04-07 6:58 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] perf annotate-arm64: Handle load and store instructions Tengda Wu
2026-04-07 7:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] perf annotate: Introduce extract_op_location callback for arch-specific parsing Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] perf dwarf-regs: Adapt get_dwarf_regnum() for arm64 Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] perf annotate-arm64: Implement extract_op_location() callback Tengda Wu
2026-04-07 7:26 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] perf annotate-arm64: Enable instruction tracking support Tengda Wu
2026-04-10 6:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support load instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-04-10 6:23 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support store " Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support stack variable tracking Tengda Wu
2026-04-10 6:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mov' instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-04-10 6:39 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'add' " Tengda Wu
2026-04-10 6:42 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'adrp' instruction to track global variables Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support per-cpu variable access tracking Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:48 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mrs' instruction to track 'current' pointer Tengda Wu
2026-04-10 6:52 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-07 6:31 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] perf arm64: Support data type profiling Namhyung Kim
2026-04-08 11:35 ` Tengda Wu
2026-04-10 7:00 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-10 8:17 ` Tengda Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adibGCaruYl4i9f8@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@arm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
--cc=lihuafei1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wutengda@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=zli94@ncsu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox