From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from stravinsky.debian.org (stravinsky.debian.org [82.195.75.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6257E311C2A for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 13:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775826411; cv=none; b=A+uYriM7vYAr+GoaLQ13L9yHTQku2tLPoHvv9ksAVcL1isYIrZKaWMnFuwxjuOPFHE9pO0Moki4bENmYr1KLbveUXvkAzwUQYmgGirQyRd7o43mBlFqtGgIAurM0NhvG8RlQBFMLMPcIfSZWchNxUFpODfauneWYpfqsqzLORDs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775826411; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sB/U9Yb3NoY2gR7UZM1LaATDCCo0nxYZYkZllZHhURI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=L+YYgTGqZ90ArUpoxCqXa7c2vIblfGdNNd0w+JajWcDX1x8h4/6jU0MmvJhiC9CU32ZzN3MUxvuSvwo+22wNcd0CJPdlG0lW4/cZuQ+gewnwIYkUgBJ3RqBZotJhH0Y44R5yhqVfOXBufsoU+aNToU/g3VXGjyT2TGibOv0D9I0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=debian.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b=XBek3pWU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b="XBek3pWU" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=ewzBU+Ju9nP+QlSxDY1jLX0KP+2OHVSPkcDbhEBxrLw=; b=XBek3pWUq7o4iwoPUMzm8Z1aDx N+m/HJ90g6gnd66YB6aN3s2/1bN1j3SBTVarxKgyMkEaNV82PKPpy8k07Q0OCP62d2g/13ce6D5KZ YWHOsiOSgdFBMkAFUFhcFjKcPIDPvE2GZ4wae7DNP+rJH/oXQ7HfB7GeVnWMYxtRvmcrb8Ynk4agv QL9kADWnINQUdsSyMks9OZU31Q5zkB8W4LJ6Jj6uLT4n5cHZqlArVzsf36YphzUcPoDO1O0UxwjHF foZxmXlo1f7/91RZz9FhlVJaZLb1Z0VwO+vNfD1dmsRuFLbVJdzRnFAlVZ504lN34a8wasj3nwG6T d9AbTguA==; Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wBBZH-009zxp-1W; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 13:06:39 +0000 Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 06:06:34 -0700 From: Breno Leitao To: Dmitry Ilvokhin Cc: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" , Andrew Morton , David Hildenbrand , Lorenzo Stoakes , "Liam R. Howlett" , Mike Rapoport , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , Christoph Lameter , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kas@kernel.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, usama.arif@linux.dev, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vmstat: fix vmstat_shepherd double-scheduling vmstat_update Message-ID: References: <20260409-vmstat-v2-1-e9d9a6db08ad@debian.org> <7cf39b82-ff21-4d9e-b2fd-1636c3e203ce@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Debian-User: leitao On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 10:51:07AM +0000, Dmitry Ilvokhin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 01:03:54AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 07:01:01PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote: > > > On 4/9/26 14:26, Breno Leitao wrote: > > > > Fixes: 7b8da4c7f07774 ("vmstat: get rid of the ugly cpu_stat_off variable") > > > > Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao > > > > Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) > > > > > > Looks like v2 posting raced with Dmitry adding R-b tag to the posting in v1 > > > thread: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/adebKQaiAP4G3liv@shell.ilvokhin.com/ > > > > Dmitry, would you mind reviewing this version as well to keep the review > > trail complete? > > > > This is essentially the same patch you already reviewed. > > Andrew seems to have already picked up my Reviewed-by in mm-new. > > There are also several other tags there, but most of them were given for > v1, while the current patch (v2) differs, so they may no longer apply. > > I've added my Reviewed-by again for this version. Thanks Dmitry!