From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>,
Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@outlook.com>,
Ching-Chun Huang <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>,
Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7712@gmail.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] sched_ext: Add select_cpu kfuncs to scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 18:07:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adkgNHHwGL2uM46o@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260410063046.3556100-3-tj@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 08:30:38PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> select_cpu_from_kfunc() has an extra scx_kf_allowed_if_unlocked() branch
> that accepts calls from unlocked contexts and takes task_rq_lock() itself
> - a "callable from unlocked" property encoded in the kfunc body rather
> than in set membership. That's fine while the runtime check is the
> authoritative gate, but the upcoming verifier-time filter uses set
> membership as the source of truth and needs it to reflect every context
> the kfunc may be called from.
>
> Add the three select_cpu kfuncs to scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked so their full
> set of callable contexts is captured by set membership. This follows the
> existing dual-set convention used by scx_bpf_dsq_move{,_vtime} and
> scx_bpf_dsq_move_set_{slice,vtime}, which are members of both
> scx_kfunc_ids_dispatch and scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked.
>
> While at it, add brief comments on each duplicate BTF_ID_FLAGS block
> (including the pre-existing dsq_move ones) explaining the dual
> membership.
>
> No runtime behavior change: the runtime check in select_cpu_from_kfunc()
> remains the authoritative gate until it is removed along with the rest
> of the scx_kf_mask enforcement in a follow-up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Minor nit below.
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext.c | 6 ++++++
> kernel/sched/ext_idle.c | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index b757b853b42b..cf441fb4b1ad 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -8497,6 +8497,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dispatch_nr_slots, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dispatch_cancel, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dsq_move_to_local, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dsq_move_to_local___v2, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS)
> +/* also in scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked: also callable from unlocked contexts */
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dsq_move_set_slice, KF_RCU)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dsq_move_set_vtime, KF_RCU)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dsq_move, KF_RCU)
Nit: we don't see it from the patch context, but below there's
scx_bpf_sub_dispatch() which also seems to be callable from unlocked context
with this comment. Maybe move scx_bpf_sub_dispatch() before this comment?
> @@ -8612,10 +8613,15 @@ __bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
>
> BTF_KFUNCS_START(scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_create_dsq, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)
> +/* also in scx_kfunc_ids_dispatch: also callable from ops.dispatch() */
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dsq_move_set_slice, KF_RCU)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dsq_move_set_vtime, KF_RCU)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dsq_move, KF_RCU)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dsq_move_vtime, KF_RCU)
> +/* also in scx_kfunc_ids_select_cpu: also callable from ops.select_cpu()/ops.enqueue() */
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, __scx_bpf_select_cpu_and, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS | KF_RCU)
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_select_cpu_and, KF_RCU)
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS | KF_RCU)
> BTF_KFUNCS_END(scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked)
>
> static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set scx_kfunc_set_unlocked = {
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
> index cd88aee47bd8..8c31fb65477c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
> @@ -1482,6 +1482,10 @@ static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set scx_kfunc_set_idle = {
> * contexts where @p's pi_lock state is unknown. Keep them out of
> * BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING by registering them in their own set which is exposed
> * only to STRUCT_OPS and SYSCALL programs.
> + *
> + * These kfuncs are also members of scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked (see ext.c) because
> + * they're callable from unlocked contexts in addition to ops.select_cpu() and
> + * ops.enqueue().
> */
> BTF_KFUNCS_START(scx_kfunc_ids_select_cpu)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, __scx_bpf_select_cpu_and, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS | KF_RCU)
> --
> 2.53.0
>
Thanks,
-Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-10 6:30 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Add verifier-time kfunc context filter Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 01/10] sched_ext: Drop TRACING access to select_cpu kfuncs Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:04 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 02/10] sched_ext: Add select_cpu kfuncs to scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:07 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-04-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 03/10] sched_ext: Track @p's rq lock across set_cpus_allowed_scx -> ops.set_cpumask Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:12 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 04/10] sched_ext: Fix ops.cgroup_move() invocation kf_mask and rq tracking Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:16 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 05/10] sched_ext: Decouple kfunc unlocked-context check from kf_mask Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:34 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 06/10] sched_ext: Drop redundant rq-locked check from scx_bpf_task_cgroup() Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:36 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 07/10] sched_ext: Add verifier-time kfunc context filter Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:49 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 08/10] sched_ext: Remove runtime kfunc mask enforcement Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:50 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 09/10] sched_ext: Rename scx_kf_allowed_on_arg_tasks() to scx_kf_arg_task_ok() Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:55 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 10/10] sched_ext: Warn on task-based SCX op recursion Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 17:38 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 17:45 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Add verifier-time kfunc context filter Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adkgNHHwGL2uM46o@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=chia7712@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
--cc=juntong.deng@outlook.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox