From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>,
Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@outlook.com>,
Ching-Chun Huang <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>,
Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7712@gmail.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] sched_ext: Drop redundant rq-locked check from scx_bpf_task_cgroup()
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 18:36:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adkm_nYLAVK2hd35@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260410063046.3556100-7-tj@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 08:30:42PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> scx_kf_allowed_on_arg_tasks() runs both an scx_kf_allowed(__SCX_KF_RQ_LOCKED)
> mask check and a kf_tasks[] check. After the preceding call-site fixes,
> every SCX_CALL_OP_TASK*() invocation has kf_mask & __SCX_KF_RQ_LOCKED
> non-zero, so the mask check is redundant whenever the kf_tasks[] check
> passes. Drop it and simplify the helper to take only @sch and @p.
>
> Fold the locking guarantee into the SCX_CALL_OP_TASK() comment block, which
> scx_bpf_task_cgroup() now points to.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Extracted from a larger verifier-time kfunc context filter patch
> originally written by Juntong Deng.
>
> Original-patch-by: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@outlook.com>
> Cc: Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Thanks,
-Andrea
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index a0bcdc805273..6d7c5c2605c7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -540,15 +540,18 @@ do { \
> })
>
> /*
> - * Some kfuncs are allowed only on the tasks that are subjects of the
> - * in-progress scx_ops operation for, e.g., locking guarantees. To enforce such
> - * restrictions, the following SCX_CALL_OP_*() variants should be used when
> - * invoking scx_ops operations that take task arguments. These can only be used
> - * for non-nesting operations due to the way the tasks are tracked.
> - *
> - * kfuncs which can only operate on such tasks can in turn use
> - * scx_kf_allowed_on_arg_tasks() to test whether the invocation is allowed on
> - * the specific task.
> + * SCX_CALL_OP_TASK*() invokes an SCX op that takes one or two task arguments
> + * and records them in current->scx.kf_tasks[] for the duration of the call. A
> + * kfunc invoked from inside such an op can then use
> + * scx_kf_allowed_on_arg_tasks() to verify that its task argument is one of
> + * those subject tasks.
> + *
> + * Every SCX_CALL_OP_TASK*() call site invokes its op with @p's rq lock held -
> + * either via the @rq argument here, or (for ops.select_cpu()) via @p's pi_lock
> + * held by try_to_wake_up() with rq tracking via scx_rq.in_select_cpu. So if
> + * kf_tasks[] is set, @p's scheduler-protected fields are stable.
> + *
> + * These macros only work for non-nesting ops since kf_tasks[] is not stacked.
> */
> #define SCX_CALL_OP_TASK(sch, mask, op, rq, task, args...) \
> do { \
> @@ -613,12 +616,8 @@ static __always_inline bool scx_kf_allowed(struct scx_sched *sch, u32 mask)
>
> /* see SCX_CALL_OP_TASK() */
> static __always_inline bool scx_kf_allowed_on_arg_tasks(struct scx_sched *sch,
> - u32 mask,
> struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - if (!scx_kf_allowed(sch, mask))
> - return false;
> -
> if (unlikely((p != current->scx.kf_tasks[0] &&
> p != current->scx.kf_tasks[1]))) {
> scx_error(sch, "called on a task not being operated on");
> @@ -9535,9 +9534,8 @@ __bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_events(struct scx_event_stats *events,
> * @p->sched_task_group->css.cgroup represents the cgroup @p is associated with
> * from the scheduler's POV. SCX operations should use this function to
> * determine @p's current cgroup as, unlike following @p->cgroups,
> - * @p->sched_task_group is protected by @p's rq lock and thus atomic w.r.t. all
> - * rq-locked operations. Can be called on the parameter tasks of rq-locked
> - * operations. The restriction guarantees that @p's rq is locked by the caller.
> + * @p->sched_task_group is stable for the duration of the SCX op. See
> + * SCX_CALL_OP_TASK() for details.
> */
> __bpf_kfunc struct cgroup *scx_bpf_task_cgroup(struct task_struct *p,
> const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
> @@ -9552,7 +9550,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct cgroup *scx_bpf_task_cgroup(struct task_struct *p,
> if (unlikely(!sch))
> goto out;
>
> - if (!scx_kf_allowed_on_arg_tasks(sch, __SCX_KF_RQ_LOCKED, p))
> + if (!scx_kf_allowed_on_arg_tasks(sch, p))
> goto out;
>
> cgrp = tg_cgrp(tg);
> --
> 2.53.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-10 6:30 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Add verifier-time kfunc context filter Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 01/10] sched_ext: Drop TRACING access to select_cpu kfuncs Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:04 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 02/10] sched_ext: Add select_cpu kfuncs to scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:07 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 03/10] sched_ext: Track @p's rq lock across set_cpus_allowed_scx -> ops.set_cpumask Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:12 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 04/10] sched_ext: Fix ops.cgroup_move() invocation kf_mask and rq tracking Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:16 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 05/10] sched_ext: Decouple kfunc unlocked-context check from kf_mask Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:34 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 06/10] sched_ext: Drop redundant rq-locked check from scx_bpf_task_cgroup() Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:36 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 07/10] sched_ext: Add verifier-time kfunc context filter Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:49 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 08/10] sched_ext: Remove runtime kfunc mask enforcement Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:50 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 09/10] sched_ext: Rename scx_kf_allowed_on_arg_tasks() to scx_kf_arg_task_ok() Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:55 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 10/10] sched_ext: Warn on task-based SCX op recursion Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 17:38 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 17:45 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Add verifier-time kfunc context filter Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adkm_nYLAVK2hd35@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=chia7712@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
--cc=juntong.deng@outlook.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox