From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>,
Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@outlook.com>,
Ching-Chun Huang <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>,
Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7712@gmail.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] sched_ext: Rename scx_kf_allowed_on_arg_tasks() to scx_kf_arg_task_ok()
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 18:55:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adkrjEscC3GEWo4P@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260410063046.3556100-10-tj@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 08:30:45PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> The "kf_allowed" framing on this helper comes from the old runtime
> scx_kf_allowed() gate, which has been removed. Rename it to describe what it
> actually does in the new model.
>
> Pure rename, no functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Thanks,
-Andrea
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index 70e9434a9a0d..27091ae075a3 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ do { \
> * SCX_CALL_OP_TASK*() invokes an SCX op that takes one or two task arguments
> * and records them in current->scx.kf_tasks[] for the duration of the call. A
> * kfunc invoked from inside such an op can then use
> - * scx_kf_allowed_on_arg_tasks() to verify that its task argument is one of
> + * scx_kf_arg_task_ok() to verify that its task argument is one of
> * those subject tasks.
> *
> * Every SCX_CALL_OP_TASK*() call site invokes its op with @p's rq lock held -
> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ do { \
> })
>
> /* see SCX_CALL_OP_TASK() */
> -static __always_inline bool scx_kf_allowed_on_arg_tasks(struct scx_sched *sch,
> +static __always_inline bool scx_kf_arg_task_ok(struct scx_sched *sch,
> struct task_struct *p)
> {
> if (unlikely((p != current->scx.kf_tasks[0] &&
> @@ -9424,7 +9424,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct cgroup *scx_bpf_task_cgroup(struct task_struct *p,
> if (unlikely(!sch))
> goto out;
>
> - if (!scx_kf_allowed_on_arg_tasks(sch, p))
> + if (!scx_kf_arg_task_ok(sch, p))
> goto out;
>
> cgrp = tg_cgrp(tg);
> --
> 2.53.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-10 6:30 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Add verifier-time kfunc context filter Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 01/10] sched_ext: Drop TRACING access to select_cpu kfuncs Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:04 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 02/10] sched_ext: Add select_cpu kfuncs to scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:07 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 03/10] sched_ext: Track @p's rq lock across set_cpus_allowed_scx -> ops.set_cpumask Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:12 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 04/10] sched_ext: Fix ops.cgroup_move() invocation kf_mask and rq tracking Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:16 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 05/10] sched_ext: Decouple kfunc unlocked-context check from kf_mask Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:34 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 06/10] sched_ext: Drop redundant rq-locked check from scx_bpf_task_cgroup() Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:36 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 07/10] sched_ext: Add verifier-time kfunc context filter Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:49 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 08/10] sched_ext: Remove runtime kfunc mask enforcement Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:50 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 09/10] sched_ext: Rename scx_kf_allowed_on_arg_tasks() to scx_kf_arg_task_ok() Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 16:55 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-04-10 6:30 ` [PATCH 10/10] sched_ext: Warn on task-based SCX op recursion Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 17:38 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-10 17:45 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Add verifier-time kfunc context filter Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adkrjEscC3GEWo4P@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=chia7712@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
--cc=juntong.deng@outlook.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox