From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] fat/msdos/vfat crud removal
Date: 9 Jun 2002 11:49:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae080b$6bk$1@cesium.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r8jhc685.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <200206090709.g5979iK439624@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <20020609114638.J13140@suse.de> <m18z5owd9f.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>
Followup to: <m18z5owd9f.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>
By author: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Dave Jones <davej@suse.de> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 03:09:44AM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> >
> > > There has been talk of removing __KERNEL__ usage from
> > > some of the header files.
> >
> > Where? If anything we need to increase __KERNEL__ usage in headers.
> > We export far too much crap which makes no sense to userspace.
>
> So we should just remove __KERNEL__ altogether. And say with 2.5.x
> nothing is exported. Which pretty much has been the official policy
> since user space started using glibc.
>
> #include <linux/*>
> and
> #include <asm/*>
> are no longer supported.
>
In theory, perhaps. There is plenty that just really can't be done
that way, especially stuff which deals with ioctls and their
structures.
It makes more sense to constrain what is exported to a minimum, but
actually have it be usable.
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-09 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-09 2:47 [patch] fat/msdos/vfat crud removal Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-09 4:24 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-06-09 4:32 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-06-09 4:46 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-09 5:07 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-06-09 6:03 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-09 6:32 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-06-09 7:09 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-09 7:49 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-06-09 9:46 ` Dave Jones
2002-06-09 17:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-09 18:49 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2002-06-09 19:00 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-09 19:29 ` David Woodhouse
2002-06-09 20:19 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-10 13:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-09 21:04 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-10 13:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-11 16:49 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-06-12 6:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-12 11:47 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-09 9:00 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-06-09 13:51 ` Martin Dalecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='ae080b$6bk$1@cesium.transmeta.com' \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox