From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-119.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-119.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9448016426; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 06:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.119 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712126149; cv=none; b=tsUzcS3GelzEh0o5tIeXyoKXkdZTuN4bMtK017/cXsR44G+OPjsB0TNXqJ8VCq3lSTIjrJ4XXDSKrjGS892bk8by4MLvtAl/tJxFIEj3h/lRXoFNB4gHoj9W1yJI2TPMaEE5g4mdw3RjNBnd4g3h9TfZ7omADW2aG1Aw1fP9KbE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712126149; c=relaxed/simple; bh=K8UzjhHydr2Hb6RuF1ir1fFhF5U29UMEjP8cwaNN7cI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:From:Subject:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Ac8iOs+ZSHNYSYVaTP8/IuiE/OZ1WpCAE8tBoAFo4dE+CVJHL5QC1k9TbY/zs+EMj30eeP43VTMEEJCIR++765jKkBgH8Gwt06dbq1zG6XjvLI0Xwxiko7Lw3dGi4YT6a3ZajPlkqbnxPTN9JT8etULtHre1wMehm8h/u+exlhY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=U5njhQ60; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.119 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="U5njhQ60" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1712126138; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:From:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=Wso2cV7BV2xvQ8GUpk+yA1IZcHOWCxmjH1vPoD4/ztM=; b=U5njhQ60vkw5rsirdIP3ybpog+59yIQkzMdioAZUU8vhoyoXwyDY56zFbyCY7r1IvSatKwuxQ9oHwiHH4uP+nSE6xFVf/yPkp0q9r0wg3L7GMwQcgTNXDfLhAofQ8jgwgViK7qHSRoMhD42Iz0BolZilAAzSqxdXly1r0o4jri0= X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R151e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018045192;MF=guwen@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=18;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0W3qcjlv_1712126124; Received: from 30.221.129.220(mailfrom:guwen@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0W3qcjlv_1712126124) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 14:35:37 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:35:24 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird From: Wen Gu Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v5 00/11] net/smc: SMC intra-OS shortcut with loopback-ism To: wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com Cc: wintera@linux.ibm.com, twinkler@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com, alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <20240324135522.108564-1-guwen@linux.alibaba.com> In-Reply-To: <20240324135522.108564-1-guwen@linux.alibaba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2024/3/24 21:55, Wen Gu wrote: > This patch set acts as the second part of the new version of [1] (The first > part can be referred from [2]), the updated things of this version are listed > at the end. > Change log: > > RFC v5->RFC v4: > - Patch #2: minor changes in description of config SMC_LO and comments. > - Patch #10: minor changes in comments and if(smc_ism_support_dmb_nocopy()) > check in smcd_cdc_msg_send(). > - Patch #3: change smc_lo_generate_id() to smc_lo_generate_ids() and SMC_LO_CHID > to SMC_LO_RESERVED_CHID. > - Patch #5: memcpy while holding the ldev->dmb_ht_lock. > - Some expression changes in commit logs. > Hi, Jan. Do you have any comments on this version and should I post a new patch series without 'RFC'? Thank you.