From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763878AbdKRB1d (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2017 20:27:33 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:42716 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763795AbdKRB1X (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2017 20:27:23 -0500 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org BE74A602A3 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=clew@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] remoteproc: qcom: Introduce sysmon To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Andy Gross , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Arun Kumar Neelakantam , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, runminw@codeaurora.org References: <20171115201012.25892-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> <20171115201012.25892-5-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> <0ab5497e-94b4-6450-d680-14f002188714@codeaurora.org> <20171117055832.GR28761@minitux> From: Chris Lew Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:27:21 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171117055832.GR28761@minitux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/16/2017 9:58 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Thu 16 Nov 12:05 PST 2017, Chris Lew wrote: >>> + req.event = SSCTL_SSR_EVENT_BEFORE_SHUTDOWN; >> >> Are there plans to add the other SSR events to sysmon notifiers? I think the >> SSCTL service expects to receive events about remote procs starting as well. >> > > We could easily add support here to send out the AFTER_BOOTUP > notification, beyond that we would need to extend the subdev notifiers > as well. > > But the downstream code paths does confuse me, can you confirm that > these messages are actually sent to the remote ssctl services? > > Regards, > Bjorn > Yea the other three events are definitely sent to the remote. The remote side posts the events for other modules to query. I'm not sure if all of the events are used by other other modules though. Thanks, Chris -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project