From: "Derrick, Jonathan" <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
To: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"ming.lei@redhat.com" <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kbusch@kernel.org" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/2] genirq/affinity: Improve __irq_build_affinity_masks()
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:36:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae67d6d6d5413caa6bfd85a9cf636bba293122da.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190819124937.9948-2-ming.lei@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2721 bytes --]
lgtm
Reviewed-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 20:49 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> One invariant of __irq_build_affinity_masks() is that all CPUs in the
> specified masks( cpu_mask AND node_to_cpumask for each node) should be
> covered during the spread. Even though all requested vectors have been
> reached, we still need to spread vectors among remained CPUs. The similar
> policy has been taken in case of 'numvecs <= nodes' already:
>
> So remove the following check inside the loop:
>
> if (done >= numvecs)
> break;
>
> Meantime assign at least 1 vector for remained nodes if 'numvecs' vectors
> have been handled already.
>
> Also, if the specified cpumask for one numa node is empty, simply not
> spread vectors on this node.
>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
> Cc: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/irq/affinity.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> index 6fef48033f96..c7cca942bd8a 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> @@ -129,14 +129,26 @@ static int __irq_build_affinity_masks(unsigned int startvec,
> for_each_node_mask(n, nodemsk) {
> unsigned int ncpus, v, vecs_to_assign, vecs_per_node;
>
> - /* Spread the vectors per node */
> - vecs_per_node = (numvecs - (curvec - firstvec)) / nodes;
> -
> /* Get the cpus on this node which are in the mask */
> cpumask_and(nmsk, cpu_mask, node_to_cpumask[n]);
> -
> - /* Calculate the number of cpus per vector */
> ncpus = cpumask_weight(nmsk);
> + if (!ncpus)
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * Calculate the number of cpus per vector
> + *
> + * Spread the vectors evenly per node. If the requested
> + * vector number has been reached, simply allocate one
> + * vector for each remaining node so that all nodes can
> + * be covered
> + */
> + if (numvecs > done)
> + vecs_per_node = max_t(unsigned,
> + (numvecs - done) / nodes, 1);
> + else
> + vecs_per_node = 1;
> +
> vecs_to_assign = min(vecs_per_node, ncpus);
>
> /* Account for rounding errors */
> @@ -156,13 +168,11 @@ static int __irq_build_affinity_masks(unsigned int startvec,
> }
>
> done += v;
> - if (done >= numvecs)
> - break;
> if (curvec >= last_affv)
> curvec = firstvec;
> --nodes;
> }
> - return done;
> + return done < numvecs ? done : numvecs;
> }
>
> /*
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3278 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-22 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-19 12:49 [PATCH V6 0/2] genriq/affinity: Make vectors allocation fair Ming Lei
2019-08-19 12:49 ` [PATCH V6 1/2] genirq/affinity: Improve __irq_build_affinity_masks() Ming Lei
2019-08-22 16:03 ` Keith Busch
2019-08-22 16:36 ` Derrick, Jonathan [this message]
2019-08-19 12:49 ` [PATCH V6 2/2] genirq/affinity: Spread vectors on node according to nr_cpu ratio Ming Lei
2019-08-19 13:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-19 13:52 ` Ming Lei
2019-08-19 14:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-22 3:09 ` Ming Lei
2019-08-22 16:03 ` Keith Busch
2019-08-22 16:36 ` Derrick, Jonathan
2019-08-25 8:02 ` [PATCH V6 0/2] genriq/affinity: Make vectors allocation fair Ming Lei
2019-08-25 9:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae67d6d6d5413caa6bfd85a9cf636bba293122da.camel@intel.com \
--to=jonathan.derrick@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox