Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sa8775p-pas: Document the SA8775p ADSP, CDSP and GPDSP

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 27/05/2024 10:43, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> 
> Document the components used to boot the ADSP, CDSP0, CDSP1, GPDSP0 and
> GPDSP1 on the SA8775p SoC.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>

Missing SoB.

> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

...


> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: /schemas/remoteproc/qcom,pas-common.yaml#
> +
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          enum:
> +            - qcom,sa8775p-adsp-pas
> +    then:
> +      properties:
> +        power-domains:
> +          items:
> +            - description: LCX power domain
> +            - description: LMX power domain
> +        power-domain-names:
> +          items:
> +            - const: lcx
> +            - const: lmx
> +
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          enum:
> +            - qcom,sa8775p-cdsp-pas

cdsp0

> +    then:
> +      properties:
> +        power-domains:
> +          items:
> +            - description: CX power domain
> +            - description: MXC power domain
> +            - description: NSP0 power domain
> +        power-domain-names:
> +          items:
> +            - const: cx
> +            - const: mxc
> +            - const: nsp0

Shouldn't this be just nsp, so both cdsp0 and cdsp1 entries can be
unified? That's the power domain from the device point of view, so the
device expects to be in some NSP domain, not explicitly NSPn.



Best regards,
Krzysztof