Re: [PATCH] drm/drm_blend: allow blend mode property without PREMULTI

["Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>]

On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 11:35:13AM -0300, Leandro Ribeiro wrote:
> Some hardware only supports the COVERAGE blend mode and lacks PREMULTI
> support entirely. DRM currently requires that PREMULTI is present when
> creating a blend mode property, which prevents such drivers from being
> properly upstreamed.
> 
> Remove this restriction and allow drivers to create a blend mode
> property without PREMULTI, enabling support for hardware that
> implements only COVERAGE blend mode.
> 
> This does not introduce a regression, as no existing upstream drivers
> expose only COVERAGE. However, userspace that wants to support such kind
> of hardware in the future will have to check the supported blend modes
> instead of assuming PREMULTI is always supported.
> 
> If the driver does not support the blend mode property, userspace must
> assume that only PREMULTI is supported (as was the case before this
> patch).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leandro Ribeiro <leandro.ribeiro@collabora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_blend.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_blend.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_blend.c
> index 1f3af27d2418..e5015d0fb219 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_blend.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_blend.c
> @@ -563,10 +563,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_normalize_zpos);
>  /**
>   * drm_plane_create_blend_mode_property - create a new blend mode property
>   * @plane: drm plane
> - * @supported_modes: bitmask of supported modes, must include
> - *		     BIT(DRM_MODE_BLEND_PREMULTI). Current DRM assumption is
> - *		     that alpha is premultiplied, and old userspace can break if
> - *		     the property defaults to anything else.
> + * @supported_modes: bitmask of supported modes. When
> + *		     BIT(DRM_MODE_BLEND_PREMULTI) is included, it will be used
> + *		     as the default. Otherwise, the default will fallback to one
> + *		     of the supported modes.
>   *
>   * This creates a new property describing the blend mode.
>   *
> @@ -586,6 +586,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_normalize_zpos);
>   *	pre-multiplied and will do so when blending them to the background color
>   *	values.
>   *
> + * Note: if the blend mode property is not present, userspace must assume that
> + * the driver supports only "Pre-multiplied".

IMO we shouldn't allow drivers to follow that rule anymore.
What we'd need is an assert that any plane that exposes
formats with alpha also exposes the blend mode property.
That would at least force the drivers to get fixed.

> + *
>   * RETURNS:
>   * Zero for success or -errno
>   */
> @@ -599,13 +602,13 @@ int drm_plane_create_blend_mode_property(struct drm_plane *plane,
>  		{ DRM_MODE_BLEND_PREMULTI, "Pre-multiplied" },
>  		{ DRM_MODE_BLEND_COVERAGE, "Coverage" },
>  	};
> +	unsigned int default_mode;
>  	unsigned int valid_mode_mask = BIT(DRM_MODE_BLEND_PIXEL_NONE) |
>  				       BIT(DRM_MODE_BLEND_PREMULTI)   |
>  				       BIT(DRM_MODE_BLEND_COVERAGE);
>  	int i;
>  
> -	if (WARN_ON((supported_modes & ~valid_mode_mask) ||
> -		    ((supported_modes & BIT(DRM_MODE_BLEND_PREMULTI)) == 0)))
> +	if (WARN_ON((supported_modes & ~valid_mode_mask)))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	prop = drm_property_create(dev, DRM_MODE_PROP_ENUM,
> @@ -630,7 +633,14 @@ int drm_plane_create_blend_mode_property(struct drm_plane *plane,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	drm_object_attach_property(&plane->base, prop, DRM_MODE_BLEND_PREMULTI);
> +	if (supported_modes & BIT(DRM_MODE_BLEND_PREMULTI))
> +		default_mode = DRM_MODE_BLEND_PREMULTI;
> +	else if (supported_modes & BIT(DRM_MODE_BLEND_COVERAGE))
> +		default_mode = DRM_MODE_BLEND_COVERAGE;
> +	else
> +		default_mode = DRM_MODE_BLEND_PIXEL_NONE;
> +
> +	drm_object_attach_property(&plane->base, prop, default_mode);
>  	plane->blend_mode_property = prop;
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.54.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel