From: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com>
To: Antoine Bouyer <antoine.bouyer@nxp.com>
Cc: julien.vuillaumier@nxp.com, alexi.birlinger@nxp.com,
daniel.baluta@nxp.com, peng.fan@nxp.com, frank.li@nxp.com,
jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com,
laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, mchehab@kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
michael.riesch@collabora.com, anthony.mcgivern@arm.com,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com, paul.elder@ideasonboard.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/11] media: uapi: v4l2-isp: Add v4l2 ISP extensible statistics definitions
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 12:03:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeCscV9eJbfswiAY@zed> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260413160331.2611829-3-antoine.bouyer@nxp.com>
Hello Antoine,
thanks for the update
On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 06:03:22PM +0200, Antoine Bouyer wrote:
> Extend the v4l2-isp extensible format introduced for isp parameters buffer
> to the statistics buffer as well.
>
> Like for ISP configuration purpose, that will help supporting various ISP
> hardware versions reporting different statistics data with less impact on
> userspace.
>
> The `v4l2_isp_stats_buffer` reuses the `v4l2_isp_params_buffer` container
> definitions, with similar header, versions and flags. V0 and V1 versions
> are provided to match with params versions. On the other side, ENABLE and
> DISABLE flags are not really meaningfull for statistics purpose. So VALID
> and INVALID flags are introduced. Purpose is to force ISP driver to
> validate a statistics buffer, before it is consumed by userspace.
Is this a leftover ?
I don't see VALID and INVALID in this patch and unless I've missed it
badly I don't see them in the next patches.
I'm fine without them, I'm not sure how you intend to use them to
force drivers to validate a statistics buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antoine Bouyer <antoine.bouyer@nxp.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/media/v4l2-isp.h | 148 +++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/media/v4l2-isp.h b/include/uapi/linux/media/v4l2-isp.h
> index 779168f9058e..e84476280d43 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/media/v4l2-isp.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/media/v4l2-isp.h
> @@ -13,25 +13,33 @@
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> /**
> - * enum v4l2_isp_params_version - V4L2 ISP parameters versioning
> + * enum v4l2_isp_version - V4L2 ISP serialization format versioning
> *
> - * @V4L2_ISP_PARAMS_VERSION_V0: First version of the V4L2 ISP parameters format
> - * (for compatibility)
> - * @V4L2_ISP_PARAMS_VERSION_V1: First version of the V4L2 ISP parameters format
> + * @V4L2_ISP_VERSION_V0: First version of the V4L2 ISP serialization format
> + * (for compatibility)
> + * @V4L2_ISP_VERSION_V1: First version of the V4L2 ISP serialization format
> *
> * V0 and V1 are identical in order to support drivers compatible with the V4L2
> - * ISP parameters format already upstreamed which use either 0 or 1 as their
> - * versioning identifier. Both V0 and V1 refers to the first version of the
> - * V4L2 ISP parameters format.
> + * ISP format already upstreamed which use either 0 or 1 as their versioning
> + * identifier. Both V0 and V1 refers to the first version of the V4L2 ISP
> + * serialization format.
> *
> - * Future revisions of the V4L2 ISP parameters format should start from the
> + * Future revisions of the V4L2 ISP serialization format should start from the
> * value of 2.
> */
> -enum v4l2_isp_params_version {
> - V4L2_ISP_PARAMS_VERSION_V0 = 0,
> - V4L2_ISP_PARAMS_VERSION_V1
> +enum v4l2_isp_version {
> + V4L2_ISP_VERSION_V0 = 0,
> + V4L2_ISP_VERSION_V1
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Compatibility with existing users of v4l2_isp_params which pre-date the
> + * introduction of v4l2_isp_stats.
> + */
> +#define v4l2_isp_params_version v4l2_isp_version
> +#define V4L2_ISP_PARAMS_VERSION_V0 V4L2_ISP_VERSION_V0
> +#define V4L2_ISP_PARAMS_VERSION_V1 V4L2_ISP_VERSION_V1
> +
> #define V4L2_ISP_PARAMS_FL_BLOCK_DISABLE (1U << 0)
> #define V4L2_ISP_PARAMS_FL_BLOCK_ENABLE (1U << 1)
>
> @@ -39,64 +47,108 @@ enum v4l2_isp_params_version {
> * Reserve the first 8 bits for V4L2_ISP_PARAMS_FL_* flag.
> *
> * Driver-specific flags should be defined as:
> - * #define DRIVER_SPECIFIC_FLAG0 ((1U << V4L2_ISP_PARAMS_FL_DRIVER_FLAGS(0))
> - * #define DRIVER_SPECIFIC_FLAG1 ((1U << V4L2_ISP_PARAMS_FL_DRIVER_FLAGS(1))
> + * #define DRIVER_SPECIFIC_FLAG0 ((1U << V4L2_ISP_FL_DRIVER_FLAGS(0))
> + * #define DRIVER_SPECIFIC_FLAG1 ((1U << V4L2_ISP_FL_DRIVER_FLAGS(1))
> */
> -#define V4L2_ISP_PARAMS_FL_DRIVER_FLAGS(n) ((n) + 8)
> +#define V4L2_ISP_FL_DRIVER_FLAGS(n) ((n) + 8)
>
> /**
> - * struct v4l2_isp_params_block_header - V4L2 extensible parameters block header
> - * @type: The parameters block type (driver-specific)
> + * struct v4l2_isp_block_header - V4L2 extensible block header
> + * @type: The parameters or statistics block type (driver-specific)
> * @flags: A bitmask of block flags (driver-specific)
> - * @size: Size (in bytes) of the parameters block, including this header
> + * @size: Size (in bytes) of the block, including this header
> *
> - * This structure represents the common part of all the ISP configuration
> - * blocks. Each parameters block shall embed an instance of this structure type
> - * as its first member, followed by the block-specific configuration data.
> + * This structure represents the common part of all the ISP configuration or
> + * statistic blocks. Each block shall embed an instance of this structure type
> + * as its first member, followed by the block-specific configuration or
> + * statistic data.
> *
> * The @type field is an ISP driver-specific value that identifies the block
> - * type. The @size field specifies the size of the parameters block.
> - *
> - * The @flags field is a bitmask of per-block flags V4L2_PARAMS_ISP_FL_* and
> - * driver-specific flags specified by the driver header.
> + * type. The @size field specifies the size of the block, including this
> + * header.
> */
> -struct v4l2_isp_params_block_header {
> +struct v4l2_isp_block_header {
> __u16 type;
> __u16 flags;
> __u32 size;
> } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>
> /**
> - * struct v4l2_isp_params_buffer - V4L2 extensible parameters configuration
> - * @version: The parameters buffer version (driver-specific)
> - * @data_size: The configuration data effective size, excluding this header
> - * @data: The configuration data
> + * v4l2_isp_params_block_header - V4L2 extensible parameters block header
> *
> - * This structure contains the configuration parameters of the ISP algorithms,
> - * serialized by userspace into a data buffer. Each configuration parameter
> - * block is represented by a block-specific structure which contains a
> - * :c:type:`v4l2_isp_params_block_header` entry as first member. Userspace
> - * populates the @data buffer with configuration parameters for the blocks that
> - * it intends to configure. As a consequence, the data buffer effective size
> - * changes according to the number of ISP blocks that userspace intends to
> - * configure and is set by userspace in the @data_size field.
> - *
> - * The parameters buffer is versioned by the @version field to allow modifying
> - * and extending its definition. Userspace shall populate the @version field to
> - * inform the driver about the version it intends to use. The driver will parse
> - * and handle the @data buffer according to the data layout specific to the
> - * indicated version and return an error if the desired version is not
> + * This structure represents the common part of all the ISP configuration blocks
> + * and is identical to :c:type:`v4l2_isp_block_header`.
> + *
> + * The @flags field is a bitmask of per-block flags V4L2_ISP_PARAMS_FL_* and
> + * driver-specific flags specified by the driver header.
What if we move this to the documentation of struct v4l2_isp_block_header
and we only document the macro for compatibility reasons like you did
for `v4l2_isp_params_version` ?
We could add the above to the documentation of `struct
v4l2_isp_block_header`:
* The @flags field is a bitmask of per-block flags. If a block is used for
* configuration parameters this field can be a combination of
* V4L2_ISP_PARAMS_FL_ and driver-specific flags.
Depending on the answer on VALID/INVALID we can document the usage of
flags for stats as:
* The @flags field is a bitmask of per-block flags. If a block is used for
* configuration parameters this field can be a combination of
* V4L2_ISP_PARAMS_FL_ and driver-specific flags. If a block is used
* for statistics this fields is used to report optional
* driver-specific flags, if any.
> + */
> +#define v4l2_isp_params_block_header v4l2_isp_block_header
If you accept the above suggestion we can simply document this
/**
* v4l2_isp_params_block_header - V4L2 extensible parameters compatibility
*
* Compatibility with existing users of v4l2_isp_params_block_header
* which pre-date the introduction of v4l2_isp_block_header.
*.
> +
> +/**
> + * v4l2_isp_stats_block_header - V4L2 extensible statistics block header
> + *
> + * This structure represents the common part of all the ISP statistics blocks
> + * and is identical to :c:type:`v4l2_isp_block_header`.
> + *
> + * The @flags field is a bitmask of driver-specific flags specified by the
> + * driver header, as there is no generic flags for statistics.
> + */
> +#define v4l2_isp_stats_block_header v4l2_isp_block_header
Do we need this or should we use v4l2_isp_block_header unconditionally ?
> +
> +/**
> + * struct v4l2_isp_buffer - V4L2 extensible buffer
> + * @version: The extensible buffer version (driver-specific)
> + * @data_size: The data effective size, excluding this header
> + * @data: The configuration or statistics data
> + *
> + * This structure contains ISP configuration parameters or ISP hardware
> + * statistics serialized into a data buffer. Each block is represented by a
> + * block-specific structure which contains a :c:type:`v4l2_isp_block_header`
> + * entry as first member.
> + *
> + * For a parameters block, userspace populates the @data buffer with
Or:
* When used for ISP parameters userspace ..
> + * configuration parameters for the blocks that it intends to configure.
> + * As a consequence, the data buffer effective size changes according to the
> + * number of ISP blocks that userspace intends to configure and is set by
> + * userspace in the @data_size field.
> + *
> + * For a statistics block, behavior is the same as for parameters, except that
Or:
* When used to report ISP statistics the driver populates the
* @data buffer with statistics for each supported measurement
* block. The buffer effective size is set by the driver in the
* @data_size field.
> + * buffer is filled by the ISP driver.
> + *
> + * The buffer is versioned by the @version field to allow modifying
> + * and extending its definition. The writer shall populate the @version field
> + * to inform the reader about the version it intends to use. The reader will
> + * parse and handle the @data buffer according to the data layout specific to
> + * the indicated version and return an error if the desired version is not
> * supported.
Ack, I think using "writer" and "reader" is clear enough to support
both the params and stats use case. If we want more clarity we can add
to "driver" and "userspace" a "(role)" in the two previous paragraph.
Something like:
* When used for ISP parameters userspace (the writer) populates
* the @data buffer ...
> *
> - * For each ISP block that userspace wants to configure, a block-specific
> - * structure is appended to the @data buffer, one after the other without gaps
> - * in between. Userspace shall populate the @data_size field with the effective
> - * size, in bytes, of the @data buffer.
> + * For each ISP block, a block-specific structure is appended to the @data
> + * buffer, one after the other without gaps in between. The writer shall
> + * populate the @data_size field with the effective size, in bytes, of the
> + * @data buffer.
If we want to describe @data_size here we can remove it from the above
two paragraphs maybe. I think it's fine to have it here only.
> */
> -struct v4l2_isp_params_buffer {
> +struct v4l2_isp_buffer {
> __u32 version;
> __u32 data_size;
> __u8 data[] __counted_by(data_size);
> };
>
> +/**
> + * v4l2_isp_params_buffer - V4L2 extensible parameters configuration
s/configuration/compatibility
> + *
> + * This structure contains the configuration parameters of the ISP algorithms,
> + * serialized into a data buffer. It is identical to
> + * :c:type:`v4l2_isp_buffer`.
And here only
* Compatibility with existing users of v4l2_isp_params_buffer which
* pre-date the introduction of v4l2_isp_buffer
> + */
> +#define v4l2_isp_params_buffer v4l2_isp_buffer
> +
> +/**
> + * v4l2_isp_stats_buffer - V4L2 extensible statistics buffer
> + *
> + * This structure contains the statistics data from the ISP hardware,
> + * serialized into a data buffer. It is identical to
> + * :c:type:`v4l2_isp_buffer`.
> + */
> +#define v4l2_isp_stats_buffer v4l2_isp_buffer
Same question as per `v4l2_isp_stats_block_header`. Do we need it ?
Thanks
j
> +
> #endif /* _UAPI_V4L2_ISP_H_ */
> --
> 2.51.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-16 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-13 16:03 [PATCH v1 00/11] media: Add iMX95 neoisp driver Antoine Bouyer
2026-04-13 16:03 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] media: Documentation: uapi: Update V4L2 ISP for extensible stats Antoine Bouyer
2026-04-16 10:27 ` Jacopo Mondi
2026-04-13 16:03 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] media: uapi: v4l2-isp: Add v4l2 ISP extensible statistics definitions Antoine Bouyer
2026-04-16 10:03 ` Jacopo Mondi [this message]
2026-04-16 10:13 ` Jacopo Mondi
2026-04-13 16:03 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] media: v4l2-isp: Add helper function to compute extended stats size Antoine Bouyer
2026-04-17 7:15 ` Jacopo Mondi
2026-04-13 16:03 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] media: Documentation: Add NXP neoisp driver documentation Antoine Bouyer
2026-04-13 16:03 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] dt-bindings: media: Add nxp neoisp support Antoine Bouyer
2026-04-15 21:31 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-04-13 16:03 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] media: v4l2-ctrls: Add user control base for NXP neoisp controls Antoine Bouyer
2026-04-13 16:03 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] media: Add meta formats supported by NXP neoisp driver Antoine Bouyer
2026-04-13 16:03 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] media: uapi: Add NXP NEOISP user interface header file Antoine Bouyer
2026-04-13 16:03 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] media: platform: Add NXP Neoisp Image Signal Processor Antoine Bouyer
2026-04-13 16:03 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] media: platform: neoisp: Add debugfs support Antoine Bouyer
2026-04-13 16:03 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] arm64: dts: freescale: imx95: Add NXP neoisp device tree node Antoine Bouyer
2026-04-16 9:20 ` [PATCH v1 00/11] media: Add iMX95 neoisp driver Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aeCscV9eJbfswiAY@zed \
--to=jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=alexi.birlinger@nxp.com \
--cc=anthony.mcgivern@arm.com \
--cc=antoine.bouyer@nxp.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=julien.vuillaumier@nxp.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=michael.riesch@collabora.com \
--cc=paul.elder@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox