From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: add p->scx.tid and SCX_OPS_TID_TO_TASK lookup
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 20:31:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeUfgbeUevwfvcXI@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <070b4b9e6b56a0c9e2e61423f35837b4@kernel.org>
On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 08:12:02AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 07:02:47PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > I'm wondering if we should have a teardown function, called before disabling
> > SCX_OPS_TID_TO_TASK and destroying scx_tid_hash, to explicitly remove all the
> > scx_tid_hash entries via rhashtable_remove_fast().
>
> rhashtable_remove_fast() doesn't clear tid_hash_node.next either - it
> just unlinks from the bucket chain, leaving obj->next at whatever the
> chain successor or nulls-marker put there. So explicit drain wouldn't
> give us a cleaner post-state.
>
> And the stale pointer is never read. After the static key is disabled,
> scx_post_fork/sched_ext_dead/scx_bpf_tid_to_task all gate on the key and
> skip the hash. On re-enable, rhashtable_init() creates fresh buckets and
> task iteration re-inserts each live task via
> rhashtable_lookup_insert_fast(), which unconditionally does
>
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(obj->next, head);
>
> at include/linux/rhashtable.h:838. Lookups always traverse from
> ht->tbl[hash], never from an embedded node.
Ah, I missed the unconditional re-init, then we should be fine.
Thanks for clarifying it.
-Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-19 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-19 16:18 [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: add p->scx.tid and SCX_OPS_TID_TO_TASK lookup Tejun Heo
2026-04-19 17:02 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-19 18:12 ` Tejun Heo
2026-04-19 18:31 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-04-19 17:23 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-04-19 18:10 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aeUfgbeUevwfvcXI@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox