From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rhashtable: Bounce deferred worker kick through irq_work when insecure_elasticity is set
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 07:02:25 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeZcIf2blLrdKvoB@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aeXnak9Yl84a-kho@gondor.apana.org.au>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 04:44:26PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 08:19:33AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Kick the deferred rehash worker. With insecure_elasticity the caller may
> > + * hold a raw spinlock. schedule_work() under a raw spinlock records
> > + * caller_lock -> pool->lock -> pi_lock -> rq->__lock. If any of these
> > + * locks is acquired in the reverse direction elsewhere, the cycle closes.
> > + * Bounce through irq_work so schedule_work() runs from hard IRQ context
> > + * with the caller's lock no longer held.
> > + */
> > +static void rhashtable_kick_deferred_worker(struct rhashtable *ht)
> > +{
> > + if (ht->p.insecure_elasticity)
> > + irq_work_queue(&ht->run_irq_work);
> > + else
> > + schedule_work(&ht->run_work);
> > +}
>
> Can we just do irq_work_queue unconditionally?
Oh yeah, that works too. I'll respin the patch.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-20 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-19 18:19 [RFC PATCH] rhashtable: Bounce deferred worker kick through irq_work when insecure_elasticity is set Tejun Heo
2026-04-20 8:44 ` Herbert Xu
2026-04-20 17:02 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH v2] rhashtable: Bounce deferred worker kick through irq_work Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 3:02 ` Herbert Xu
2026-04-21 6:03 ` [PATCH v3] " Tejun Heo
2026-04-21 6:06 ` Herbert Xu
2026-04-21 6:14 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aeZcIf2blLrdKvoB@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox