public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	 Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
	 Meng Li <li.meng@amd.com>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>,
	"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] x86/itmt: Use guard() for itmt_update_mutex
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 10:22:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aec6094baa036188c4af0d13d5a3a61cbdb7d976.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241211185552.4553-3-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>

On Wed, 2024-12-11 at 18:55 +0000, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Use guard() for itmt_update_mutex which avoids the extra mutex_unlock()
> in the bailout and return paths.

Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>

Tim

> 
> Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c | 29 ++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c
> index 28f449123d68..ee43d1bd41d0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/itmt.c
> @@ -44,12 +44,10 @@ static int sched_itmt_update_handler(const struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>  	unsigned int old_sysctl;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&itmt_update_mutex);
> +	guard(mutex)(&itmt_update_mutex);
>  
> -	if (!sched_itmt_capable) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&itmt_update_mutex);
> +	if (!sched_itmt_capable)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
>  
>  	old_sysctl = sysctl_sched_itmt_enabled;
>  	ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
> @@ -59,8 +57,6 @@ static int sched_itmt_update_handler(const struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>  		rebuild_sched_domains();
>  	}
>  
> -	mutex_unlock(&itmt_update_mutex);
> -
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -97,18 +93,14 @@ static struct ctl_table_header *itmt_sysctl_header;
>   */
>  int sched_set_itmt_support(void)
>  {
> -	mutex_lock(&itmt_update_mutex);
> +	guard(mutex)(&itmt_update_mutex);
>  
> -	if (sched_itmt_capable) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&itmt_update_mutex);
> +	if (sched_itmt_capable)
>  		return 0;
> -	}
>  
>  	itmt_sysctl_header = register_sysctl("kernel", itmt_kern_table);
> -	if (!itmt_sysctl_header) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&itmt_update_mutex);
> +	if (!itmt_sysctl_header)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> -	}
>  
>  	sched_itmt_capable = true;
>  
> @@ -117,8 +109,6 @@ int sched_set_itmt_support(void)
>  	x86_topology_update = true;
>  	rebuild_sched_domains();
>  
> -	mutex_unlock(&itmt_update_mutex);
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -134,12 +124,11 @@ int sched_set_itmt_support(void)
>   */
>  void sched_clear_itmt_support(void)
>  {
> -	mutex_lock(&itmt_update_mutex);
> +	guard(mutex)(&itmt_update_mutex);
>  
> -	if (!sched_itmt_capable) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&itmt_update_mutex);
> +	if (!sched_itmt_capable)
>  		return;
> -	}
> +
>  	sched_itmt_capable = false;
>  
>  	if (itmt_sysctl_header) {
> @@ -153,8 +142,6 @@ void sched_clear_itmt_support(void)
>  		x86_topology_update = true;
>  		rebuild_sched_domains();
>  	}
> -
> -	mutex_unlock(&itmt_update_mutex);
>  }
>  
>  int arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu)


  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-12 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-11 18:55 [PATCH 0/8] x86, sched: Dynamic ITMT core ranking support and some yak shaving K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-11 18:55 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86/itmt: Convert "sysctl_sched_itmt_enabled" to boolean K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-12 18:09   ` Tim Chen
2024-12-11 18:55 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/itmt: Use guard() for itmt_update_mutex K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-12 18:22   ` Tim Chen [this message]
2024-12-11 18:55 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/itmt: Move the "sched_itmt_enabled" sysctl to debugfs K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-12 19:15   ` Tim Chen
2024-12-13  4:01     ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-13 17:19       ` Tim Chen
2024-12-13  9:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-11 18:55 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/topology: Remove x86_smt_flags and use cpu_smt_flags directly K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-12 21:05   ` Tim Chen
2024-12-11 18:55 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/topology: Use x86_sched_itmt_flags for PKG domain unconditionally K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-13 21:07   ` Tim Chen
2024-12-11 18:55 ` [PATCH 6/8] sched/fair: Do not compute NUMA Balancing stats unnecessarily during lb K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-12 11:05   ` Vincent Guittot
2024-12-12 11:43     ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-12 13:28       ` Vincent Guittot
2024-12-13 14:55   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-12-11 18:55 ` [PATCH 7/8] sched/fair: Do not compute overloaded status " K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-12  9:56   ` Vincent Guittot
2024-12-12 11:01     ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-12 11:18       ` Vincent Guittot
2024-12-12 11:30         ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-13 14:57   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-12-13 19:51     ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-11 18:55 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] sched/fair: Uncache asym_prefer_cpu and find it during update_sd_lb_stats() K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-13 15:02   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-12-13 20:00     ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-13  0:33 ` [PATCH 0/8] x86, sched: Dynamic ITMT core ranking support and some yak shaving Tim Chen
2024-12-13  4:12   ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-13 21:11     ` Tim Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aec6094baa036188c4af0d13d5a3a61cbdb7d976.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=li.meng@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox