* af_unix.c, KBUILD_MODNAME and unix
@ 2005-03-20 13:45 Magnus Damm
2005-03-20 13:52 ` Russell King
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Magnus Damm @ 2005-03-20 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello All,
af_unix.c is currenty built with KBUILD_MODNAME=unix. This seems to
work rather well today, but if someone actually tries to use
KBUILD_MODNAME then they will end up with a preprocessor surprise:
KBUILD_MODNAME -> unix -> 1, because "unix" is defined to 1.
With other words, if someone adds module_param(foo,...) code to
af_unix.c and compiles the code as built in then they will have to use
"1.foo" to set the variable instead of "unix.foo" as expected.
Solution? #undef unix?
I came across this when trying to autogenerate parameter documentation...
/ magnus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: af_unix.c, KBUILD_MODNAME and unix
2005-03-20 13:45 af_unix.c, KBUILD_MODNAME and unix Magnus Damm
@ 2005-03-20 13:52 ` Russell King
2005-03-20 14:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Russell King @ 2005-03-20 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Magnus Damm; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 02:45:36PM +0100, Magnus Damm wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> af_unix.c is currenty built with KBUILD_MODNAME=unix. This seems to
> work rather well today, but if someone actually tries to use
> KBUILD_MODNAME then they will end up with a preprocessor surprise:
> KBUILD_MODNAME -> unix -> 1, because "unix" is defined to 1.
>
> With other words, if someone adds module_param(foo,...) code to
> af_unix.c and compiles the code as built in then they will have to use
> "1.foo" to set the variable instead of "unix.foo" as expected.
>
> Solution? #undef unix?
or maybe -Uunix ?
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: af_unix.c, KBUILD_MODNAME and unix
2005-03-20 13:52 ` Russell King
@ 2005-03-20 14:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-03-20 15:52 ` Magnus Damm
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2005-03-20 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell King; +Cc: Magnus Damm, linux-kernel
>> Hello All,
>>
>> af_unix.c is currenty built with KBUILD_MODNAME=unix. This seems to
>> Solution? #undef unix?
>
>or maybe -Uunix ?
Why is not KBUILD_MODNAME=af_unix ?
Jan Engelhardt
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: af_unix.c, KBUILD_MODNAME and unix
2005-03-20 14:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
@ 2005-03-20 15:52 ` Magnus Damm
2005-03-20 21:51 ` Jan Engelhardt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Magnus Damm @ 2005-03-20 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Engelhardt; +Cc: Russell King, linux-kernel
> >> af_unix.c is currenty built with KBUILD_MODNAME=unix. This seems to
> >> Solution? #undef unix?
> >
> >or maybe -Uunix ?
>
> Why is not KBUILD_MODNAME=af_unix ?
The exact solution does not matter that much to me, and I'm afraid I
do not know how changing KBUILD_MODNAME affects the rest of the
codebase. So basically - someone else should decide... but who?
/ magnus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: af_unix.c, KBUILD_MODNAME and unix
[not found] <fa.jj4t62d.1j5ccif@ifi.uio.no>
@ 2005-03-20 20:21 ` Bodo Eggert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bodo Eggert @ 2005-03-20 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Magnus Damm, linux-kernel
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com> wrote:
> Solution? #undef unix?
#define unix unix?
provided nobody uses unix numerically.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: af_unix.c, KBUILD_MODNAME and unix
2005-03-20 15:52 ` Magnus Damm
@ 2005-03-20 21:51 ` Jan Engelhardt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2005-03-20 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Magnus Damm; +Cc: Russell King, linux-kernel
>> Why is not KBUILD_MODNAME=af_unix ?
>
>The exact solution does not matter that much to me, and I'm afraid I
>do not know how changing KBUILD_MODNAME affects the rest of the
>codebase. So basically - someone else should decide... but who?
KBUILD_MODNAME is "not used", which means you can use it for anything that
like. You can undef it, redefine, thwap it all over and whatnot.
It's a generosity from /usr/bin/make generally providing the module with its
own name.
Jan Engelhardt
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-20 21:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-20 13:45 af_unix.c, KBUILD_MODNAME and unix Magnus Damm
2005-03-20 13:52 ` Russell King
2005-03-20 14:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-03-20 15:52 ` Magnus Damm
2005-03-20 21:51 ` Jan Engelhardt
[not found] <fa.jj4t62d.1j5ccif@ifi.uio.no>
2005-03-20 20:21 ` Bodo Eggert
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox