From: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-os@analogic.com, roland@topspin.com,
asterixthegaul@gmail.com, damm@opensource.se,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] disable built-in modules V2
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:53:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aec7e5c305040711535bbe07d3@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050407102925.2ab27740.rddunlap@osdl.org>
On Apr 7, 2005 7:29 PM, Randy.Dunlap <rddunlap@osdl.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:22:57 -0400 (EDT) Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> | Can't you disable module-loading with a module? I think so.
> | You don't need to modify the kernel. Boot-scripts could
> | just load the "final" module and there is nothing that
> | can be done to add another module (or even unload existing
> | ones).
>
> Sounds likely, but that's not what the patch from Magnus is
> even trying to do. It's purely for boot-time selection of
> troublesome modules or devices AFAICT. I've had a few
> occasions to use something like this -- or rebuild a kernel
> or remove a device.
Yes, the idea is to be able to disable misbehaving built-in modules
from the kernel command line. The alternative is of course to disable
the code using the kernel configuration system and rebuild the kernel.
Say a kernel shipped with your favourite distribution crashes your
machine during boot-up - wouldn't it be nice to be able to just
disable the problematic module from the kernel command line instead of
(1) getting the config, (2) getting the distribution-specific patches,
(3) rebuilding the kernel. And if you are lucky you need to (0) setup
a cross compiler and (4) get your hands on a suitable initrd.
/ magnus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-07 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-05 23:29 [PATCH][RFC] disable built-in modules V2 Magnus Damm
2005-04-06 10:32 ` Malcolm Rowe
2005-04-06 13:10 ` Magnus Damm
2005-04-06 14:28 ` Malcolm Rowe
2005-04-06 22:14 ` Magnus Damm
2005-04-07 7:47 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-04-07 1:32 ` AsterixTheGaul
2005-04-07 2:23 ` Roland Dreier
2005-04-07 8:23 ` Magnus Damm
2005-04-07 17:01 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-04-07 17:22 ` Richard B. Johnson
2005-04-07 17:29 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-04-07 18:53 ` Magnus Damm [this message]
2005-04-09 1:42 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-09 9:43 ` Magnus Damm
2005-04-09 9:48 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-09 10:03 ` Magnus Damm
2005-04-09 10:07 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-09 10:14 ` Magnus Damm
2005-04-07 17:37 ` Dave Jones
2005-04-07 2:38 ` Horst von Brand
2005-04-07 21:33 ` Magnus Damm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aec7e5c305040711535bbe07d3@mail.gmail.com \
--to=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=asterixthegaul@gmail.com \
--cc=damm@opensource.se \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=roland@topspin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox