From: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: rddunlap@osdl.org, linux-os@analogic.com, roland@topspin.com,
asterixthegaul@gmail.com, damm@opensource.se,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] disable built-in modules V2
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:43:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aec7e5c3050409024365d724dd@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1DK4zA-0005rr-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
On Apr 9, 2005 3:42 AM, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Say a kernel shipped with your favourite distribution crashes your
> > machine during boot-up - wouldn't it be nice to be able to just
> > disable the problematic module from the kernel command line instead of
>
> Perhaps your favourite distribution could build that as a module to
> start with.
Right. Today distributions can boot from external usb-storage devices,
maybe even from firewire hardware as I am sure you know. I guess they
have support for a device built-in for a reason. I think most
distributions have as streamlined kernels as possible with much code
built as modules - but they would still need some code built-in in the
kernel to have a generic kernel that supports a lot of block devices.
So I think my patch still have a value.
In my case a firewire phy is broken - and, yes - I should fix my
hardware instead of moaning about it here...
Thanks,
/ magnus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-09 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-05 23:29 [PATCH][RFC] disable built-in modules V2 Magnus Damm
2005-04-06 10:32 ` Malcolm Rowe
2005-04-06 13:10 ` Magnus Damm
2005-04-06 14:28 ` Malcolm Rowe
2005-04-06 22:14 ` Magnus Damm
2005-04-07 7:47 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-04-07 1:32 ` AsterixTheGaul
2005-04-07 2:23 ` Roland Dreier
2005-04-07 8:23 ` Magnus Damm
2005-04-07 17:01 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-04-07 17:22 ` Richard B. Johnson
2005-04-07 17:29 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-04-07 18:53 ` Magnus Damm
2005-04-09 1:42 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-09 9:43 ` Magnus Damm [this message]
2005-04-09 9:48 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-09 10:03 ` Magnus Damm
2005-04-09 10:07 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-09 10:14 ` Magnus Damm
2005-04-07 17:37 ` Dave Jones
2005-04-07 2:38 ` Horst von Brand
2005-04-07 21:33 ` Magnus Damm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aec7e5c3050409024365d724dd@mail.gmail.com \
--to=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=asterixthegaul@gmail.com \
--cc=damm@opensource.se \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=roland@topspin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox