From: Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@android.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: overlayfs: caller_credentials option bypass creator_cred
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:59:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aecdeaca-74cf-54b1-3ea9-4751972074f5@android.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180618194345.GA15973@redhat.com>
On 06/18/2018 12:43 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Will it be acceptable to write security policies in such a way so that
> mounter has access as well.
Unfortunately No. Policy of minimizing attack surface for a contained
root service (init in this case). Just because it can mount, does not
mean it can modify critical content; an attacker could use this to open
a hole.
> Current model does assume that mounter has privileges on underlying files.
Only ones it appears to need is the workdir AFAIK, had to add ability to
create in the <wordir> xattr in order to enable r/w mounts later.
Although not all corners were tested, I did not see any copy_up issues
b/c the caller had the privs in the Android security model when mounted
with this new flag.
-- Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-18 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-18 15:42 overlayfs: caller_credentials option bypass creator_cred Mark Salyzyn
2018-06-18 18:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2018-06-18 19:18 ` Mark Salyzyn
2018-06-18 19:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2018-06-18 21:59 ` Mark Salyzyn [this message]
2018-06-19 14:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2018-06-20 15:28 ` Mark Salyzyn
2018-06-18 18:57 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aecdeaca-74cf-54b1-3ea9-4751972074f5@android.com \
--to=salyzyn@android.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dwalsh@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox