From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CFE92D2483; Wed, 22 Apr 2026 17:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776878338; cv=none; b=sNpciYAyMkztynACOaAKjKIXGIyscB5eupFOuCadLvv8Y/PYtgMP8k239Ku/hyIFda9qhz3EU6BvfaavZTnkjnK7CWAl7riy4wjb9yRQwlMjGSBqGErLJAu93qNzKJHd/YCX+txHbg90QJ3zaScF1541gnaoE2ZY/3bPQElP7kg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776878338; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FiYQa7tnRLyTpJd8T5DYYtmAKyOHGq337bdQwXrjTX4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sKBzWWxsxhU2zKfgkpNbGjBjep1auIWlePnLFFfvWsTr96nxkHjEH5JwOD/mgn2rtlBZ6TfVk1x+nL5HLRYb+aUmDcvRahvqKbBJRNHWLn7/7M8g4mgjuOWuvcxLeNLzYDLWan3Ga6AcFV01M5MVgWvtvv5A/WpoDSwRuhefNcw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qZb0AAtt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qZb0AAtt" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9FB0C19425; Wed, 22 Apr 2026 17:18:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1776878338; bh=FiYQa7tnRLyTpJd8T5DYYtmAKyOHGq337bdQwXrjTX4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qZb0AAttHkohmh/8tCxKykx78MJOuXRQhJupp76IsR/DVFCXON88tX+p9i2Iu003c dvFBxjL9bv3Z8hXlQGp/5XNLMT/teHDhUbkf1RpkI9XKv59CkRdgd6H/ZjpJ30fvQI llby9Ou9c6oy+5AP3GzlkJJLpJMfFs/YdlXKfGOzs7qv7wytkQ1ilPAQ4f73uu/jzH lCEUZdAOwD3ZYEJHLBIzCm1096r6OfO5C6k/EBzlDgVll4igvq2+M1m7cJo6Eb/Xay yITxVweSwofuUzkRgjeXFnuAnnwUE3BilTPEG5UComNAzrflmlnQDKkcFHdwxIOshv YmI2JeylGO1hw== Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 07:18:57 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Cheng-Yang Chou Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, David Vernet , Andrea Righi , Changwoo Min , Ching-Chun Huang , Chia-Ping Tsai , Emil Tsalapatis , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: Refactor scx_root_enable_workfn() enablement task migration Message-ID: References: <20260421074154.584737-1-yphbchou0911@gmail.com> <6cccef586daa450e322d9659d4e64e13@kernel.org> <20260422094555.Gaec7@cchengyang.duckdns.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260422094555.Gaec7@cchengyang.duckdns.org> On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 09:53:24AM +0800, Cheng-Yang Chou wrote: > Regarding the ordering of the task enablement sequence: do you think > it would be useful to be included in the kdoc? Who'd be the audience tho? This isn't a level of detail that'd be interesting to people who want to use SCX. For kernel devs, I don't think a doc which just restates the code sequence is all that useful when you can just throw an AI agent at it and get the same and more in no time. -- tejun