From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable <stable@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - use u32 for reg_size to avoid sign extension into item->reg_size
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:59:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ael3yDbI3_1oarHN@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026042046-clad-aspect-e8f9@gregkh>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 08:59:46PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> rmi_read_register_desc() builds the 4-byte register size from device
> bytes:
>
> reg_size = struct_buf[offset] |
> (struct_buf[offset + 1] << 8) |
> (struct_buf[offset + 2] << 16) |
> (struct_buf[offset + 3] << 24);
>
> struct_buf is u8 *, so each byte is promoted to int before the shift. A
> device that supplies a top byte with bit 7 set (e.g. 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 80 in struct_buf to reach the 4-byte path with offset+3 = 0x80) makes
> (0x80 << 24) overflow into the int sign bit, and the OR result is
> negative. reg_size is then assigned to item->reg_size, which is
> unsigned long, so the negative int sign-extends to a value near
> ULONG_MAX.
>
> After this, bad things happen when numbers start wrapping and buffers
> are allocatged based on those numbers, and then accessed based on those
> buffers assuming to be a sane size (bigger or smaller).
>
> Fix this all up by just properly making reg_size be a u32.
Shouldn't it be replaced with get_unaligned_le32() instead?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-23 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-20 18:59 [PATCH 1/2] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - validate register descriptor structure against its declared size Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-20 18:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - use u32 for reg_size to avoid sign extension into item->reg_size Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-04-23 1:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2026-04-23 4:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ael3yDbI3_1oarHN@google.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox