public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Partha Satapathy <partha.satapathy@oracle.com>
Cc: anna-maria@linutronix.de, tglx@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
	jiangshanlai@gmail.com, notify@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] timers/workqueue: Add support for active CPU
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:05:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeoLD_DWrXAP3Ynb@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423091914.63645-1-partha.satapathy@oracle.com>

Hi,

Le Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 09:19:05AM +0000, Partha Satapathy a écrit :
> From: Partha Sarathi Satapathy <partha.satapathy@oracle.com>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Timers queued with add_timer_on() and delayed work queued with
> queue_delayed_work_on() currently rely on the caller to ensure that the
> target CPU remains online until the enqueue operation completes. In
> practice, CPU hotplug can still race with that sequence and leave the
> timer queued on an offline CPU, where it will not run until that CPU
> comes back online.
> 
> For delayed work, this has a direct knock-on effect: if the backing
> timer is stranded on an offline CPU, the work item is never queued for
> execution until that CPU returns.
> 
> In many cases, the target CPU is chosen for locality and cache affinity
> rather than as a strict execution requirement. Falling back to an active
> CPU is preferable to leaving the timer or delayed work blocked on a dead
> CPU. While callers can try to track CPU hotplug state themselves, that
> does not close the race, and taking the hotplug lock around enqueue
> operations is too expensive for this class of use.
> 
> This series adds opt-in helpers for that fallback behavior without
> changing the semantics of the existing interfaces:
> 
>   - add_timer_active_cpu() queues a timer on the requested CPU only if
>     the target CPU's timer base is active; otherwise it falls back to
>     the current CPU.
> 
>   - queue_delayed_work_active_cpu() uses the new timer helper for the
>     delayed timer path and updates dwork->cpu to reflect the CPU
>     actually selected for the timer, so the work item is queued on the
>     same active CPU.
> 
> The existing add_timer_on() and queue_delayed_work_on() behavior is left
> unchanged for callers that require strict CPU placement.

Timers are migrated when CPUs go offline. So the problem is queueing
a timer to an offline CPU. It should be the responsibility of a subsystem
to synchronize with CPU hotplug in order to avoid that.

As for timers that are queued locally not for correctness but for performance
reasons, do we know such example?

Thanks.

-- 
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-23 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-23  9:19 [PATCH 0/2] timers/workqueue: Add support for active CPU Partha Satapathy
2026-04-23  9:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] timer: add add_timer_active_cpu() Partha Satapathy
2026-04-23  9:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: add queue_delayed_work_active_cpu() Partha Satapathy
2026-04-23 12:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aeoLD_DWrXAP3Ynb@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=notify@kernel.org \
    --cc=partha.satapathy@oracle.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox