From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: SUVONOV BUNYOD <b.suvonov@sjtu.edu.cn>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, david@kernel.org,
mhocko@kernel.org, zhengqi arch <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
ljs@kernel.org,
mathieu desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: add balance_pgdat begin/end tracepoints
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 19:15:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aerSNntuPLdGWts6@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1868971658.1970916.1776991584726.JavaMail.zimbra@sjtu.edu.cn>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 08:46:24AM +0800, SUVONOV BUNYOD wrote:
> Thank you for reviewing Shakeel,
>
> > Do we need to trace highest_zoneidx at the end? Can it change within
> > balance_pgdat()?
>
> highest_zoneidx does not change within a balance_pgdat() invocation. It
> is passed in as an argument and remains the classzone bound used for the
> balancing checks throughout the function.
>
> I kept highest_zoneidx in the end tracepoint to make the outcome event
> self-contained. In principle, begin/end correlation is possible, but
> under sustained memory pressure kswapd reclaim can be frequent enough
> that consumers may prefer to analyze end events directly, and any
> dependence on matching begin/end becomes less convenient and less robust
> in the presence of filtering or dropped trace records.
>
> Since nr_reclaimed and the final order are only known at the end, having
> highest_zoneidx there allows end-only analysis without correlating with
> the begin event.
>
> For example, it lets users answer questions like:
> - this pass reclaimed too much or too little memory; what highest_zoneidx
> did that result correspond to?
> - how much reclaim was done when balancing up to ZONE_NORMAL vs other
> classzone bounds?
> - when highest_zoneidx == ZONE_NORMAL, how often did reclaim finish at
> order=0?
>
> So it is there because it provides context for the end-of-reclaim result.
> Do you think this is sufficient justification? If not, then I can drop it
> from the end tracepoint in v2.
I think it is ok but let's add this reasoning in the commit message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-24 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 10:37 [PATCH] mm/vmscan: add balance_pgdat begin/end tracepoints Bunyod Suvonov
2026-04-23 17:46 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-04-24 0:46 ` SUVONOV BUNYOD
2026-04-24 2:15 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2026-04-24 3:14 ` [PATCH v2] " Bunyod Suvonov
2026-04-24 3:16 ` Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aerSNntuPLdGWts6@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=b.suvonov@sjtu.edu.cn \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox