From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Yiqi Sun" <sunyiqixm@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Bobby Eshleman" <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Arseniy Krasnov" <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Bobby Eshleman" <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] vsock/virtio: fix length and offset in tap skb for split packets
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 15:22:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af5iLWLo4Kz+USum@devvm29614.prn0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508164411.261440-2-sgarzare@redhat.com>
On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 06:44:10PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
>
> virtio_transport_build_skb() builds a new skb to be delivered to the
> vsockmon tap device. To build the new skb, it uses the original skb
> data length as payload length, but as the comment notes, the original
> packet stored in the skb may have been split in multiple packets, so we
> need to use the length in the header, which is correctly updated before
> the packet is delivered to the tap, and the offset for the data.
>
> This was also similar to what we did before commit 71dc9ec9ac7d
> ("virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff") where we probably
> missed something during the skb conversion.
>
> Also update the comment above, which was left stale by the skb
> conversion and still mentioned a buffer pointer that no longer exists.
>
> Fixes: 71dc9ec9ac7d ("virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff")
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> index 9b8014516f4f..a678d5d75704 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> @@ -166,12 +166,12 @@ static struct sk_buff *virtio_transport_build_skb(void *opaque)
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> size_t payload_len;
>
> - /* A packet could be split to fit the RX buffer, so we can retrieve
> - * the payload length from the header and the buffer pointer taking
> - * care of the offset in the original packet.
> + /* A packet could be split to fit the RX buffer, so we use
> + * the payload length from the header, which has been updated
> + * by the sender to reflect the fragment size.
> */
> pkt_hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(pkt);
> - payload_len = pkt->len;
> + payload_len = le32_to_cpu(pkt_hdr->len);
>
> skb = alloc_skb(sizeof(*hdr) + sizeof(*pkt_hdr) + payload_len,
> GFP_ATOMIC);
> @@ -219,7 +219,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *virtio_transport_build_skb(void *opaque)
>
> virtio_transport_copy_nonlinear_skb(pkt, data, payload_len);
> } else {
> - skb_put_data(skb, pkt->data, payload_len);
> + skb_put_data(skb, pkt->data + VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(pkt)->offset,
> + payload_len);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.54.0
>
Reviewed-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-08 16:44 [PATCH net 0/2] vsock/virtio: fix vsockmon tap skb construction Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-08 16:44 ` [PATCH net 1/2] vsock/virtio: fix length and offset in tap skb for split packets Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-08 22:22 ` Bobby Eshleman [this message]
2026-05-08 16:44 ` [PATCH net 2/2] vsock/virtio: fix empty payload in tap skb for non-linear buffers Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-08 22:30 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-05-09 19:38 ` [PATCH net 0/2] vsock/virtio: fix vsockmon tap skb construction Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-12 11:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af5iLWLo4Kz+USum@devvm29614.prn0.facebook.com \
--to=bobbyeshleman@gmail.com \
--cc=avkrasnov@salutedevices.com \
--cc=bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=sunyiqixm@gmail.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox