public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Matt Evans <mattev@meta.com>,
	Ted Logan <tedlogan@fb.com>, Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfio: selftests: only build tests on arm64 and x86_64
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 19:02:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afEEN_4ufBcQld0q@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afATrrjqt8zj2plL@google.com>

On 2026-04-27 06:55 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 01:55:17PM +0000, Matt Evans wrote:
> > > Hi Ted,
> > > 
> > > On 03/02/2026 01:23, Ted Logan wrote:
> > > > Only build vfio self-tests on arm64 and x86_64; these are the only
> > > > architectures where the vfio self-tests are run. Addresses compiler
> > > > warnings for format and conversions on i386.
> > > > 
> > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601211830.aBEjmEFD-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ted Logan <tedlogan@fb.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > Do not build vfio self-tests for 32-bit architectures, where they're
> > > > untested and unmaintained. Only build these tests for arm64 and x86_64,
> > > > where they're regularly tested.
> > > > 
> > > > Compiler warning fixed by patch:
> > > > 
> > > >    In file included from tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio.h:6:
> > > >    tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio/iommu.h:49:2: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned long' but the argument has type 'u64' (aka 'unsigned long long') [-Wformat]
> > > >       49 |         VFIO_ASSERT_EQ(__iommu_unmap(iommu, region, NULL), 0);
> > > >          |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >    tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio/assert.h:32:37: note: expanded from macro 'VFIO_ASSERT_EQ'
> > > >       32 | #define VFIO_ASSERT_EQ(_a, _b, ...) VFIO_ASSERT_OP(_a, _b, ==, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > > >          |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >    tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio/assert.h:27:22: note: expanded from macro 'VFIO_ASSERT_OP'
> > > >       26 |         fprintf(stderr, "  Observed: %#lx %s %#lx\n",                           \
> > > >          |                                              ~~~~
> > > >       27 |                         (u64)__lhs, #_op, (u64)__rhs);                          \
> > > >          |                                           ^~~~~~~~~~
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > - Add white space around arch checks
> > > > - Clean up uname command
> > > > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260130-vfio-selftest-only-64bit-v1-1-d89ac0944c01@fb.com
> > > > ---
> > > >  tools/testing/selftests/vfio/Makefile | 9 +++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/Makefile
> > > > index ead27892ab65..8e90e409e91d 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/Makefile
> > > > @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
> > > > +ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m)
> > > > +
> > > > +ifeq (,$(filter $(ARCH),arm64 x86_64))
> > > 
> > > This fails to build (i.e. elides the build) on my local arm64 machine,
> > > because uname -m returns 'aarch64', not 'arm64'.
> > 
> > I have the same issue on x86! The kernel uses x86 is the ARCH when you
> > run it straight from the top level make
> > 
> > make[4]: Entering directory '/home/jgg/oss/wip/mlx5st/tools/testing/selftests/vfio'
> > Makefile:1: "Saw ARCH=x86"
> > 
> > Even though this is a 64 bit build.
> 
> Heh, it's much funnier when it's happening to someone else.  :-)
> 
> KVM selftests went through these exact pains.  I'm pretty sure these are the
> relevant commits (the empty targets one may or may not apply to VFIO).
> 
> 9af04539d474dda4984ff4909d4568e6123c8cba KVM: selftests: Override ARCH for x86_64 instead of using ARCH_DIR
> 67730e6c53d70fb31618230f81c4acee9f72eaa3 KVM: selftests: Use canonical $(ARCH) paths for KVM selftests directories
> 43fbd8cd389faa9760c5152b1c58e893c812953b KVM: selftests: Provide empty 'all' and 'clean' targets for unsupported ARCHs

KVM selftests don't prevent 32-bit x86 builds though, which is part of what
we're trying to do here.

For example running...

  $ make -C tools/testing/selftests/kvm ARCH=x86 CC="gcc -m32"

...produces a lot of -Wformat errors that were also seeing in VFIO selftests
from the kernel test robot.

I think something like this would fix your issue Jason. I haven't tested it on
ARM yet:

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/Makefile
index 0684932d91bf..db71aef6bfb2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/Makefile
@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
 ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m)

-ifeq (,$(filter $(ARCH),aarch64 arm64 x86_64))
+# VFIO selftests are currently only supported on 64-bit x86 and ARM.
+ifneq (,$(filter $(ARCH),x86 x86_64 aarch64 arm64))
+SUPPORTED_ARCH := $(shell echo __LP64__ | $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -E -x c - | tail -n 1)
+endif
+
+ifneq ($(SUPPORTED_ARCH),1)
 # Do nothing on unsupported architectures
 include ../lib.mk
 else


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-28 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-03  1:23 [PATCH v2] vfio: selftests: only build tests on arm64 and x86_64 Ted Logan
2026-02-06 17:54 ` David Matlack
2026-02-06 22:05 ` Alex Williamson
2026-03-17 13:55 ` Matt Evans
2026-03-17 19:05   ` Ted Logan
2026-04-27 23:12   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-28  1:55     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-04-28 19:02       ` David Matlack [this message]
2026-04-28 19:52         ` Sean Christopherson
2026-04-28 20:08           ` David Matlack
2026-04-28 22:03             ` Sean Christopherson
2026-04-28 22:53               ` David Matlack
2026-04-28 22:55                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-28 23:02                   ` David Matlack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afEEN_4ufBcQld0q@google.com \
    --to=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mattev@meta.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tedlogan@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox