From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Cc: Titouan Ameline <titouan.ameline@gmail.com>,
tzungbi@kernel.org, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: google: fix orphaned devices on partial populate failure
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:33:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afEZlycZGgTiD0Ga@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAODwPW8T6o93pQodem-hNrszH_dsa5KMTu0iRY6y8CLJNjfXsA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 12:49:35PM -0700, Julius Werner wrote:
> > Given that, would the right approach be to continue the loop on
> > entry-specific errors ( logging a warning), while still aborting and
> > cleaning up on systemic ones like -ENOMEM? Or is the name collision
> > case considered impossible here since names are derived from the
> > tag/index and the table is only parsed once?
>
> I don't think you should hardcode behavior so specific to what the
> called function does. Trying every entry doesn't really hurt even if
> they all fail due to some systemic problem, so if there's any chance
> that other entries might succeed, I think the best option is to just
> always continue the loop and try the next one.
FWIW, of_platform_populate() might be a (highly-used) analog for
comparison. Aside from some top-level errors (such as, "can't even find
the root to start from"), it doesn't actually return errors at all [1].
It just skips individual device failures (including -ENOMEM).
Seems like an OK strategy to me.
Brian
[1] of_platform_bus_create() technically has some recursion-carried
return codes, giving a chance to propagate a failure, but all the return
codes are still 0.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-28 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-26 22:02 [PATCH] firmware: google: fix orphaned devices on partial populate failure Titouan Ameline de Cadeville
2026-04-27 19:03 ` Julius Werner
2026-04-27 21:36 ` Titouan Ameline
2026-04-28 19:49 ` Julius Werner
2026-04-28 20:33 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2026-04-30 8:30 ` Titouan Ameline
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afEZlycZGgTiD0Ga@google.com \
--to=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jwerner@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=titouan.ameline@gmail.com \
--cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox