Re: [PATCH 0/7] dts: Add /firmware/#{address,size}-cells to Chromium-based DTs

[Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>]

On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 02:43:21PM -0700, Julius Werner wrote:
> > I reviewed Depthcharge code history and found that this problematic
> > bootloader behavior dates back to at least 2014, with the Tegra/Nyan
> > device. Older devices may have similar DTB structures, but I'm not sure
> > if they have the same address-cells problems. In any case, these changes
> > shouldn't hurt even if a device was not affected.
> 
> I can confirm that Nyan was the first Arm device shipping with
> depthcharge. Note that the Exynos devices are all older and shipped
> with an old fork of U-Boot that probably handled this very differently
> (I believe they had `/firmware/chromeos` but not `/firmware/coreboot`,
> so they wouldn't have had a `reg` node and should need no `ranges`).

OK, so that makes patch 4 unnecessary:

  [PATCH 4/7] ARM: dts: samsung: Add #{address,size}-cells to Chromium-based /firmware

If I respin this, I can drop it. Or if it otherwise looks good,
presumably folks can just skip patch 4.

Thanks,
Brian