Re: [PATCH v4] ACPI: pmic: Replace mutex_lock/unlock() with guard()/scoped_guard()

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>]

On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 08:24:32PM -0500, Maxwell Doose wrote:

...

>  v4:
>  - Added else keyword to if statement in
>    intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element() per Andy's request.

Nope, sorry if I was not clear. The idea is to drop 'else'.
Also make the patch less invasive.

...

> -			       __func__, i2c_address, reg_address, value, mask);

> +				__func__, i2c_address, reg_address, value, mask);

Still a stray change.

...

It should be

	int ret; // also left untouched, drop that from commit message as well

        if (d->exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element) {
		// the below if-else-if just should be left untouched.
		if (i2c_address == d->pmic_i2c_address) {
			...
		} else {
			...
		}

		return ret;
	}

	if (d->pmic_i2c_address) {
	}

	...warnings...
	return -EOPNOTSUPP;

We may get a second patch for deeper refactoring later on.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko