From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: <will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <jgg@nvidia.com>,
<kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: <joro@8bytes.org>, <praan@google.com>, <kees@kernel.org>,
<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, <miko.lenczewski@arm.com>,
<smostafa@google.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>, <jamien@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rc v4 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add arm_smmu_kdump_adopt_strtab() for kdump
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:37:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afJ6Lu0aZyff5TYZ@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <edc9df0e05559ee3edfeb833b84d421d9b040dba.1777446969.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 12:20:49AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> +static int arm_smmu_kdump_adopt_strtab_2lvl(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> + u32 cfg_reg, dma_addr_t dma)
[...]
> + for (i = 0; i < num_l1_ents; i++) {
> + u64 l2ptr = le64_to_cpu(cfg->l2.l1tab[i].l2ptr);
Sashiko pointed out a missing READ_ON here.
And in arm_smmu_is_attach_deferred() too.
I've made a small change to my local v5 tree:
@@ -4337,7 +4337,8 @@ static bool arm_smmu_is_attach_deferred(struct device *dev)
for (i = 0; i < master->num_streams; i++) {
struct arm_smmu_ste *ste =
arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(smmu, master->streams[i].id);
- u64 ent0 = le64_to_cpu(ste->data[0]);
+ /* Pairing READ_ONCE() with the WRITE_ONCE() in entry_set() */
+ u64 ent0 = le64_to_cpu(READ_ONCE(ste->data[0]));
/* Defer only when there might be in-flight DMAs */
if ((ent0 & STRTAB_STE_0_V) &&
@@ -4747,7 +4748,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_kdump_adopt_strtab_2lvl(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
return -ENOMEM;
for (i = 0; i < num_l1_ents; i++) {
- u64 l2ptr = le64_to_cpu(cfg->l2.l1tab[i].l2ptr);
+ /* L1 entry is shared with the SMMU and possibly rogue DMA */
+ u64 l2ptr = le64_to_cpu(READ_ONCE(cfg->l2.l1tab[i].l2ptr));
dma_addr_t l2_dma = l2ptr & STRTAB_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK;
u32 span = FIELD_GET(STRTAB_L1_DESC_SPAN, l2ptr);
Given these are two small changes, they shouldn't block community
review. I will wait for a few days before finalizing/sending v5.
Thanks
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-29 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-29 7:20 [PATCH rc v4 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix device crash on kdump kernel Nicolin Chen
2026-04-29 7:20 ` [PATCH rc v4 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add arm_smmu_kdump_adopt_strtab() for kdump Nicolin Chen
2026-04-29 21:37 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2026-04-30 11:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-30 15:24 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-04-29 7:20 ` [PATCH rc v4 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Implement is_attach_deferred() " Nicolin Chen
2026-04-29 7:20 ` [PATCH rc v4 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Skip EVTQ/PRIQ setup in kdump kernel Nicolin Chen
2026-04-29 7:20 ` [PATCH rc v4 4/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Retain CR0_SMMUEN during kdump device reset Nicolin Chen
2026-04-29 7:20 ` [PATCH rc v4 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Detect ARM_SMMU_OPT_KDUMP_ADOPT in probe() Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afJ6Lu0aZyff5TYZ@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jamien@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miko.lenczewski@arm.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox