From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FBDD41325F; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 18:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777487775; cv=none; b=mpBU2mhW+u5HD4JxCTEfj/9eUOxqnwxsAnnH67w6SbRpUMqpFEfXXwiwFewA8Y0EKhg4cPvdIqaq+GKVVQfuoJSRkScIrJpZfwT1+zNYgHmywSgSj+WNwfTyj8m5/wr0rmZDtizxWKY9y8AbZ61jc5iFmDowoObGTrKS3WGpB6A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777487775; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zZrolC6IKbvIDlb+Lb5WPy+jjpwMTeYxMXWnoS5eB9s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ljMZqrxJHtiDDucvwUsEIeqKwgeijmac2Bm6+cHkUKUjRXWIu9n4QIiVSsQyCk5LZi9F4hYhcn2fCYajFxYhsjVJkMLJkwgoN4d+PM3vWzyFKCfclUp2X2nqKniqdx9ByZ2/PsqhSXLER/CVeVvQJPEfbDjQXZ6ahvlZEHwrgDU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=I+/cDJtp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="I+/cDJtp" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1777487773; x=1809023773; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=zZrolC6IKbvIDlb+Lb5WPy+jjpwMTeYxMXWnoS5eB9s=; b=I+/cDJtp8y9jyEdHkWSDTNiibr6nkgvSgnHOCYDibwDkHTCQ+ewzLlVT 9G/tFX0KiBCQHriozFu32O9FwJSgDyQotKPyA5mZ63X8lyRBDA3YwgvrB mEJbdXLs3XR24LXYAyd7hvHcbdV5JA6lA1lTVSDE4LYLVwt7YnjNuIZbM BhwfI/VwkWqkEDmfG/H6g3CaxS3c6TP/fopd00rumZ2L59+bkoM4be/FK qM6y6Ts8OVjh7LErrpx1mvVzrbI0IkaqnGOxQ3ap2Y8R7dicc700B4whe qKjwHWforGPhe9DLJLs0efNtla7CjMEKIxTeJfoUOCp5iVRXIP0U/M8DD A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: f6rYgAanTymgMSmpLRcNdw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: sASV5ytiR/SJPFBMJt8M0Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11771"; a="89889335" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,206,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="89889335" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Apr 2026 11:36:13 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 6A5aKknpSZ2GNyJPB9OfTA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: BMPwEnJVT+6SzK5JNJuXMw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,206,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="238320500" Received: from ettammin-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.141]) by ORVIESA003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Apr 2026 11:36:10 -0700 Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 21:36:07 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Roman Gushchin Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Felix Gu , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , Lars-Peter Clausen , Arnaud Pouliquen , Mark Brown , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: buffer: hw-consumer: fix use-after-free in error path Message-ID: References: <20260428192636.58e4fc8b@jic23-huawei> <7ia4qznx1z3b.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <7ia4qznx1z3b.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 05:00:08PM +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote: > Andy Shevchenko writes: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 11:34:22AM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote: > >> > On Apr 28, 2026, at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > >> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2026 18:59:28 +0300 > >> > Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > >> >> I am also wondering should we put Reported-by with the reference to AI somehow? > >> >> Jonathan, others, what are your opinions? > >> > > >> > Would be nice to do so for these - things noticed whilst reviewing a patch > >> > type reports. > >> > > >> > Roman (+CC), any suggestions on how to do this? > >> > >> I appreciate when people are recognizing Sashiko, but I don’t have any strong > >> preference. Many engineers are using it locally before sending patches > >> upstream, so we’ll never know it anyway. But Reported-by/Assisted-by tags are > >> appreciated when appropriate. > > > > The problem is what to put to Reported-by as an email. For example LKP bot or > > syzbot have dedicated emails for that. What about Sashiko? > > We have sashiko-bot@kernel.org ! Good to know, thanks. > > P.S. > > An offtopic, how can I be email notified on the reviews done by Sashiko against > > my patches sent to Linux kernel project (mailing lists)? If you can add me > > as andy@kernel.org, I appreciate that! > > I don't have a personal opt-in at the moment, Whenever it appears (I hope to see it rather sooner) put me first in the list to be Cc'ed! > it's configurable per > mailing list. The current configuration is here: > https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/blob/main/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml > > I generally rely on the consensus decision by corresponding maintainers. Noted, thanks for clarification. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko