From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Griffin Kroah-Hartman <griffin.kroah@fairphone.com>
Subject: Re: Unexpected behavior of of_regulator_get()?
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:18:03 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afM6a3lWHnU3_q3-@sirena.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DI6ABL0HCWTB.2K5532GWRM6US@fairphone.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1930 bytes --]
On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 08:44:40AM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Thu Apr 30, 2026 at 2:10 AM CEST, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 10:18:31AM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> >> event-hall-sensor {
> >> label = "Hall Effect Sensor";
> >> vdd-supply = <&vreg_l10b>;
> >> };
> > I don't understand what this is supposed to describe.
> Such hall effect sensor requires power, so the IC has a VDD/VCC pin
Neither of which is "supply".
> which needs to be powered, in order for the GPIO of the IC to trigger,
> and that Linux can create an input event from it. So far this was mostly
> described in devicetree using regulator-always-on because the devicetree
> bindings & driver did not support that.
I think at the point where you're shoehorning a separate device into the
middle of a keyboard with a non-descriptive binding you're making
problems - at some point someone is going to try to shoehorn something
that has two supplies into the binding and everyone will be sad. These
sorts of attempts to describe regulators in a "standard" way that
doesn't correspond to the actual hardware generally cause problems like
the AHCI ones. I'd just make a separate input device here, you're
trying to solve a problem that you've actively created by not
representing the hardware.
> There's devm_regulator_get_optional() which gets a regulator for a given
> device (on the gpio-keys level), and my expectation of
> of_regulator_get() was that you point it at a devicetree node (e.g. the
> event-hall-sensor subnode and it grabs the regulator from that node, not
> from the parent (gpio-keys), nor from a different subnode of gpio-keys.
of_regulator_get() is not intended to be used by anything other than
framework code, the use case for a driver to use it would be that it's
got bindings that don't map well onto Linux or it's just made a mess of
it's bindings and needs to bodge it's way out of that situation.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-29 8:18 Unexpected behavior of of_regulator_get()? Luca Weiss
2026-04-30 0:10 ` Mark Brown
2026-04-30 6:44 ` Luca Weiss
2026-04-30 11:18 ` Mark Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afM6a3lWHnU3_q3-@sirena.co.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=griffin.kroah@fairphone.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.weiss@fairphone.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox