From: Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, tools@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>,
David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
Askar Safin <safinaskar@zohomail.com>,
Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@redhat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kernel/api: enable kerneldoc-based API specifications
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:47:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afNrbm8URHlClZ-8@levanger> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260424165130.2306833-3-sashal@kernel.org>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 12:51:22PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> This patch adds support for extracting API specifications from
> kernel-doc comments and generating C macro invocations for the
> kernel API specification framework.
>
> Changes include:
> - New kdoc_apispec.py module for generating API spec macros
> - Updates to kernel-doc.py to support -apispec output format
> - Build system integration in Makefile.build
> - Generator script for collecting all API specifications
> - Support for API-specific sections in kernel-doc comments
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/dev-tools/kernel-api-spec.rst | 11 +
> scripts/Makefile.build | 31 +
> scripts/Makefile.clean | 3 +
> tools/docs/kernel-doc | 5 +
> tools/lib/python/kdoc/kdoc_apispec.py | 1249 +++++++++++++++++++
> tools/lib/python/kdoc/kdoc_output.py | 9 +-
> tools/lib/python/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py | 86 +-
> 7 files changed, 1389 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/lib/python/kdoc/kdoc_apispec.py
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kernel-api-spec.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kernel-api-spec.rst
> index 395c2294d5209..479bc78797ba8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kernel-api-spec.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kernel-api-spec.rst
> @@ -239,6 +239,17 @@ execution context, and return values. Parameter violations are reported via
> ``pr_warn_ratelimited`` and return value violations via ``WARN_ONCE`` to avoid
> flooding the kernel log.
>
> +.. warning::
> +
> + Userspace errno is affected when this option is on. For syscalls that
> + violate their parameter specification, KAPI short-circuits the call and
> + returns ``-EINVAL`` from the validator **before** the real handler runs.
> + That errno can differ from what the real handler would have produced for
> + the same condition (for example, ``-ENOMEM`` from an allocation path or
> + ``-EFAULT`` from a deeper copy-in). ``CONFIG_KAPI_RUNTIME_CHECKS`` is a
> + debug-only option; do not enable it on production kernels or in
> + userspace-visible test environments where error-code fidelity matters.
> +
> Custom Validators
> -----------------
>
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.build b/scripts/Makefile.build
> index 3652b85be5459..ef203e490c797 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.build
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.build
> @@ -174,6 +174,37 @@ ifneq ($(KBUILD_EXTRA_WARN),)
> endif
> endif
>
> +# Generate API spec headers from kernel-doc comments
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_KAPI_SPEC),y)
> +# Function to check if a file has API specifications
> +has-apispec = $(shell grep -qE '^\s*\*\s*context-flags:' $(src)/$(1) 2>/dev/null && echo $(1))
> +
> +# Get base names without directory prefix
> +c-objs-base := $(notdir $(real-obj-y) $(real-obj-m))
> +# Filter to only .o files with corresponding .c source files
> +c-files := $(foreach o,$(c-objs-base),$(if $(wildcard $(src)/$(o:.o=.c)),$(o:.o=.c)))
Looks to me as if the two lines above are redundant, since 'find'
(below) will find all files gathered in $(c-files).
> +# Also check for any additional .c files that contain API specs but are included
> +extra-c-files := $(shell find $(src) -maxdepth 1 -name "*.c" -exec grep -l '^\s*\*\s*\(long-desc\|context-flags\|state-trans\):' {} \; 2>/dev/null | xargs -r basename -a)
> +# Combine both lists and remove duplicates
> +all-c-files := $(sort $(c-files) $(extra-c-files))
> +# Only include files that actually have API specifications
> +apispec-files := $(foreach f,$(all-c-files),$(call has-apispec,$(f)))
> +# Generate apispec targets with proper directory prefix
> +apispec-y := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(apispec-files:.c=.apispec.h))
To goal is to find any relevant C file in $(src)/ (but not deeper below)
that holds KAPI documentation, right?
I do not like the find call, as it picks up anything. Might it make
sense to evaluate $(obj-) along with $(obj-y) and $(obj-m) to pick up
all C files that are references in kbuild?
# in top definition block -- before 'include $(kbuild-file)' et al.
obj- :=
# below the definitions of real-obj-{y,m}
real-obj-any := $(call real-search, $(obj-y) $(obj-m) $(obj-), .o, -objs -y -m -)
has-apispec = $(shell grep -lE '^\s*\*\s*context-flags:' $(1) 2>/dev/null)
apispec-y := $(patsubst $(src)/%.c, $(obj)/%.apispec.h, $(call has-apispec,
$(patsubst $(obj)/%.o, $(src)/%.c, $(real-obj-any))))
#...
# Source files that include their own apispec.h need to depend on it
$(apispec-y:.apispec.h=.o): $(obj)/%.o: $(obj)/%.apispec.h
(untested)
> +always-y += $(apispec-y)
> +targets += $(apispec-y)
> +
> +quiet_cmd_apispec = APISPEC $@
> + cmd_apispec = PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 $(KERNELDOC) -apispec \
> + $(KDOCFLAGS) $< > $@ || rm -f $@
> +
> +$(obj)/%.apispec.h: $(src)/%.c $(KERNELDOC) FORCE
> + $(call if_changed,apispec)
> +
> +# Source files that include their own apispec.h need to depend on it
> +$(foreach f,$(apispec-files),$(eval $(obj)/$(f:.c=.o): $(obj)/$(f:.c=.apispec.h)))
> +endif
> +
> # Compile C sources (.c)
> # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.clean b/scripts/Makefile.clean
> index 6ead00ec7313b..f78dbbe637f27 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.clean
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.clean
> @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ __clean-files := $(filter-out $(no-clean-files), $(__clean-files))
>
> __clean-files := $(wildcard $(addprefix $(obj)/, $(__clean-files)))
>
> +# Also clean generated apispec headers (computed dynamically in Makefile.build)
> +__clean-files += $(wildcard $(obj)/*.apispec.h)
We have a list of wildcard clean patterns in top-level Makefile
(line 2114 ff.); please add '*.apispec.h' there instead.
When I apply the series on top of v7.1, compilation fails with
../fs/open.c:2148:10: fatal error: open.apispec.h: No such file or directory
../fs/read_write.c:2519:10: fatal error: read_write.apispec.h: No such file or directory
Kind regards,
Nicolas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 16:51 [PATCH v3 0/9] Kernel API Specification Framework Sasha Levin
2026-04-24 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] kernel/api: introduce kernel API specification framework Sasha Levin
2026-04-27 3:37 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-04-29 16:32 ` Nicolas Schier
2026-04-29 16:43 ` Nicolas Schier
2026-04-24 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] kernel/api: enable kerneldoc-based API specifications Sasha Levin
2026-04-30 14:47 ` Nicolas Schier [this message]
2026-04-24 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] kernel/api: add debugfs interface for kernel " Sasha Levin
2026-04-24 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] tools/kapi: add kernel API specification extraction tool Sasha Levin
2026-04-24 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] kernel/api: add API specification for sys_open Sasha Levin
2026-04-24 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] kernel/api: add API specification for sys_close Sasha Levin
2026-04-24 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] kernel/api: add API specification for sys_read Sasha Levin
2026-04-24 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] kernel/api: add API specification for sys_write Sasha Levin
2026-04-24 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] kernel/api: add runtime verification selftest Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afNrbm8URHlClZ-8@levanger \
--to=nsc@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=gpaoloni@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jake@lwn.net \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=safinaskar@zohomail.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tools@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox