From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta1.formilux.org (mta1.formilux.org [51.159.59.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C0B73431E6; Fri, 1 May 2026 07:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=51.159.59.229 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777622358; cv=none; b=NIlT9pcGNUtZAXYda44ukwR9xlPBbKc7SktpvK9URfsVlafSSiu/+p6ftnlEA4Jeo1dxBh3EY+WQ18s/OAuZdj48DmCARTlI0JovYPM5JodiQjDREINZ/AU2PYHH8VemOIXdKt6Yp3ZyesMgk+TnoHUQE/MYOFABgxa+TCLfrac= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777622358; c=relaxed/simple; bh=N4mrsNzdWk6tOBnoyUyiBaCEP8aS3RfCv5qOYULDMc4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tnNxbCOlHFhteJByhBjQCO3HQxdjfdBldwYQ/S3mJ+BCHrSoYjIrScP4Zkfx7070wUeNjqpx8ZbqxONPzmJXNh69LQVATJEwfCRyMMPiZl79han3+AI+X1437U76Th/MZPIwa/uHQAZLfecVoY9JQNQxV7GE48crQTWL+8JO8p4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=1wt.eu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=1wt.eu; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=1wt.eu header.i=@1wt.eu header.b=t7I12aUF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=51.159.59.229 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=1wt.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=1wt.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=1wt.eu header.i=@1wt.eu header.b="t7I12aUF" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1wt.eu; s=mail; t=1777622355; bh=slTtZbemCbfCCnwj1l+83CNOvt3Nnt6FGfm9jNroCl0=; h=From:Message-ID:From; b=t7I12aUF7z8wrvL9UwB/RTu2sp0oJbb9BZVdXUNjYp1U1lBKEtDapGCOCp9zNrZVR kbDi/txCAGGmxf/rDC9LI4ehcE+ZYFs8I/gWXuUInCVdXbpjeR6sHtBeEKP48wdY3Y WaybM1mg6P/4C/tynlcJJ3d1sIG4i8E7KDj98kfk= Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by mta1.formilux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBCDC0A7D; Fri, 01 May 2026 09:59:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 1 May 2026 09:59:14 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= Cc: Stafford Horne , Jonas Bonn , Stefan Kristiansson , linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools/nolibc: add support for OpenRISC / or1k Message-ID: References: <20260429-nolibc-openrisc-v2-1-8d7d7a2f3fec@weissschuh.net> <5f223443-0136-4938-ac93-14876e788ff1@t-8ch.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <5f223443-0136-4938-ac93-14876e788ff1@t-8ch.de> On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 10:58:31PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > On 2026-04-29 19:43:08+0100, Stafford Horne wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 05:20:45PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > Add support for OpenRISC / or1k to nolibc. > > > > > > _start() uses the same wrapper construct as in arch-sh.h. > > > libgcc is necessary as OpenRISC is missing 64-bit multiplication. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh > > > > Acked-by: Stafford Horne > > Thanks! > > > Do you want me to pick this up to send via the openrisc queue? Or do you prefer > > it go via the selftests queue? > > I'll take it through the nolibc tree. Otherwise we'd get a bunch of > merge conflicts, too. > > (...) And from a nolibc perspective it's also an ack by me, thanks Thomas! Acked-by: Willy Tarreau willy