The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@9elements.com>
Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] hwmon (max6639): Use regmap
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 06:49:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afb5d43b-14ff-4859-afce-000dbd4bb62e@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABqG17inSB8stBf=ObaYKj4FREpXKWSy=7XXO9O3RhEx_v74vg@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/29/24 01:19, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> 
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 at 22:48, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/25/24 02:50, Naresh Solanki wrote:
>> ...
>>> This driver has 27 regmap accesses. Except volatile registers, others are
>>> cached by regmap.
>>> Some function which only access volatile registers will not be able to take
>>> advantage of caching. This is also the case in various other drivers for similar
>>> devices.
>>> Also regmap offers bit handling which makes the code much cleaner.
>>>
>>
>> Maybe I need to make it explicit in documentation. I will not accept regmap
>> conversions unless local caching is dropped. Yes, that means that volatile
>> registers will not be cached. I consider that a positive.
> I agree with you. Regmap conversion wouldn't make sense if local caching
> is present.
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but in this context, local caching points to the
> various variables in max6639_data ?
> i.e.,
>      bool valid;     /* true if following fields are valid */
>      unsigned long last_updated; /* In jiffies */
> 
>      /* Register values sampled regularly */
>      u16 temp[2];        /* Temperature, in 1/8 C, 0..255 C */
>      bool temp_fault[2]; /* Detected temperature diode failure */
>      u8 fan[2];      /* Register value: TACH count for fans >=30 */
>      u8 status;      /* Detected channel alarms and fan failures */
> 
>      /* Register values only written to */
>      u8 pwm[2];      /* Register value: Duty cycle 0..120 */
>      u8 temp_therm[2];   /* THERM Temperature, 0..255 C (->_max) */
>      u8 temp_alert[2];   /* ALERT Temperature, 0..255 C (->_crit) */
>      u8 temp_ot[2];      /* OT Temperature, 0..255 C (->_emergency) */
> 
>      /* Register values initialized only once */
>      u8 ppr;         /* Pulses per rotation 0..3 for 1..4 ppr */
>      u8 rpm_range;       /* Index in above rpm_ranges table */
> 
> Are you asking for removal of all these variables & each read sysfs
> attribute read should access regmap cache directly ?
> 

Mostly yes. Note that "ppr" is only used in max6639_init_client(),
and it is unnecessary to keep it in max6639_data to start with.
rpm_range is ok to keep because it is a calculated initialization value.
The fixed initialization of temp_therm, temp_alert, and temp_ot
is questionable to start with because it overrides bios/rommon
initialization values.

Guenter


      reply	other threads:[~2024-04-29 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-16 17:17 [PATCH 1/4] hwmon (max6639): Use regmap Naresh Solanki
2024-04-16 17:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] hwmon: (max6639) : Utilise pwm subsystem Naresh Solanki
2024-04-16 21:22   ` Guenter Roeck
2024-04-22 10:39     ` Naresh Solanki
2024-04-22 12:37       ` Guenter Roeck
2024-05-06 10:05         ` Naresh Solanki
2024-05-06 13:49           ` Guenter Roeck
2024-04-17  7:04   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-04-16 17:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] hwmon: (max6639) : Add hwmon init using info Naresh Solanki
2024-04-16 17:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] hwmon (max6639): Remove hwmon init with group Naresh Solanki
2024-04-16 21:23   ` Guenter Roeck
2024-04-16 21:25 ` [PATCH 1/4] hwmon (max6639): Use regmap Guenter Roeck
2024-04-22 10:36   ` Naresh Solanki
2024-04-22 16:02     ` Guenter Roeck
2024-04-25  9:50       ` Naresh Solanki
2024-04-28 17:18         ` Guenter Roeck
2024-04-29  8:19           ` Naresh Solanki
2024-04-29 13:49             ` Guenter Roeck [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afb5d43b-14ff-4859-afce-000dbd4bb62e@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naresh.solanki@9elements.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox