From: contact@zalexdev.com
To: richard@nod.at, anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com,
johannes@sipsolutions.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] um: an arm64 subarch for User Mode Linux
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 21:42:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afe5075686534c5c781e93c19fe77d28@zalexdev.com> (raw)
Hi,
I have ARCH=um SUBARCH=arm64 working -- 33 patches on uml/next. Before
sending that many to the list I would like to know if it is wanted, and
in
what shape.
https://github.com/zalexdev/linux-um-arm64 (branch um-arm64)
Boots Alpine and Debian at 4K and 16K pages, SECCOMP and ptrace
userspace,
loadable modules.
The part I want an opinion on is syscall interception on hosts without
PTRACE_SYSEMU, since 5.3 is a recent floor for arm64 and phones ship
4.19.
There the guest syscall is cancelled by writing -1 to NT_ARM_SYSTEM_CALL
at
a PTRACE_SYSCALL stop. That fails under a seccomp filter, though: arm64
reports the ptrace stop before running seccomp, so the filter sees the
-1
and an Android app sandbox kills the tracee. So the third path
substitutes
getppid(2) for the guest's call -- the call still does not run, but a
syscall does execute on the guest's behalf. Is that acceptable? nosysemu
and nocancel select the fallbacks on any host, so they are testable
without a 4.19 machine.
Modules reuse arch/arm64/kernel/module.c and module-plts.c instead of a
second copy, the way arch/x86/um does. That does mean pulling two files
out
of arch/arm64.
Two changes are performance only. The stub handoff skips FUTEX_WAKE when
nobody is parked and spins against CNTVCT_EL0 before parking; anonymous
faults are batched onto the handoff that was happening anyway.
Snapdragon
870, SECCOMP mode, medians of 7 interleaved rounds:
syscall 9.841 -> 1.987 us
openat 20.223 -> 4.501 us
fault 24.592 -> 11.076 us
Known problems: no 32-bit compat, UP only, and "BUG: Bad rss-counter
state
... type:MM_FILEPAGES val:1" once per exiting process under Debian but
not
under Alpine on the same kernel. I have not found that one and would not
expect it merged as is.
About a third of the patches are not arm64 -- generic um/ fixes and two
x86
ones, including a missing 32-bit stub_seccomp_save_state -- but they sit
on
top of the subarch commit and do not apply alone. I can rebase them into
a
separate series first if that is more useful.
I cannot commit to maintaining this long-term. Happy to respin or split
it
however you want; say the word and I will send the series with
git send-email.
Thanks,
Oleksii
reply other threads:[~2026-08-15 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afe5075686534c5c781e93c19fe77d28@zalexdev.com \
--to=contact@zalexdev.com \
--cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox