Re: [PATCH] dm-table:fix zone block_device not aligned with zonesize

[Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>]

On 7/5/24 00:29, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2024, Li Dong wrote:
> 
>> For zone block devices, device_area_is_invalid may return an incorrect 
>> value.
>>
>> Failure log:
>> [   19.337657]: device-mapper: table: 254:56: len=836960256 not aligned to
>> h/w zone size 3244032 of sde
>> [   19.337665]: device-mapper: core: Cannot calculate initial queue limits
>> [   19.337667]: device-mapper: ioctl: unable to set up device queue for 
>> new table.
>>
>> Actually, the device's zone length is aligned to the zonesize.
>>
>> Fixes: 5dea271b6d87 ("dm table: pass correct dev area size to device_area_is_valid")
>> Signed-off-by: Li Dong <lidong@vivo.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/md/dm-table.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-table.c b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
>> index 33b7a1844ed4..0bddae0bee3c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/dm-table.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
>> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int device_area_is_invalid(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
>>  	if (bdev_is_zoned(bdev)) {
>>  		unsigned int zone_sectors = bdev_zone_sectors(bdev);
>>  
>> -		if (start & (zone_sectors - 1)) {
>> +		if (start % zone_sectors) {
>>  			DMERR("%s: start=%llu not aligned to h/w zone size %u of %pg",
>>  			      dm_device_name(ti->table->md),
>>  			      (unsigned long long)start,
>> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static int device_area_is_invalid(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
>>  		 * devices do not end up with a smaller zone in the middle of
>>  		 * the sector range.
>>  		 */
>> -		if (len & (zone_sectors - 1)) {
>> +		if (len % zone_sectors) {
>>  			DMERR("%s: len=%llu not aligned to h/w zone size %u of %pg",
>>  			      dm_device_name(ti->table->md),
>>  			      (unsigned long long)len,
>> -- 
>> 2.31.1.windows.1
> 
> Hi
> 
> This probably won't compile on 32-bit architectures because the operators 
> for 64-bit divide and modulo don't work there.
> 
> Please, rework the patch using dm_sector_div64.

This patch alone will not allow non power of 2 zone size drives to be supported
as the block layer will reject such drive in the first place. This patch should
be part of a larger series enabling such support. On its own, it is a NACK from
me for this change.

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research