From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com (mail-wm1-f54.google.com [209.85.128.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5243DC4D5 for ; Mon, 4 May 2026 13:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.54 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777902906; cv=none; b=bp8TVP7LB4bkqR8SKHSTlfNrlZVXPj0g0usM6i061CPZGm/Ln44tDKx7A6p/VV53Vv/GLxV+rkokbbIWxuQhVU9CK6Cwrt3s/n2EGYWEF8dQahMWsZnr7sGA/m9ZGchCFMh+KNai1mkvHWdSKs69sgiAzo0fuOiPyFuti4iCoEU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777902906; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bOPfveR5SWntqqKowAn0D9LMMHj7n+8HdW2KpvzZmqA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kk2vq4f02Xy2d6AcObbXKka9KUu0aj96fYglT397Ulhnjf/z4Ec3jzbKybJAAvMNIRF9ubl09I8uShzyMyu/K/60wEh7j7Q3HfFUTNiLZfRJtA/Gdpi7t0islMhQjtn6fepEtpgS3LsevUUeqDNIQs13K/LazBlMT1jAMmYwDiA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=baylibre.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=baylibre.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=baylibre-com.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.i=@baylibre-com.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.b=aQiKKv2v; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.54 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=baylibre.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=baylibre.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=baylibre-com.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.i=@baylibre-com.20251104.gappssmtp.com header.b="aQiKKv2v" Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4838c15e3cbso32825345e9.3 for ; Mon, 04 May 2026 06:55:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20251104.gappssmtp.com; s=20251104; t=1777902902; x=1778507702; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EtOd9wIvmtizVVlUV0Z3G/eI46M4pQxdkiteSTykGQo=; b=aQiKKv2vHMBdXqlu377+NQdeiBIp4QIsmUpw4IliMuW23cfCJHfCSpb63wPOABXNEy Y+b94CR6viLA9LjrVQZ7d24tKGtykwiFMgKVkDm4CQaiOR9KstwioqtrmcinjFAM00Cd EyV8W+02ttujQ45lPEq1uwSRZkpQSfLnR7LPCgH/dcUBT9jyyXB2huskSsXzD/4cQYgL JFmqLoYUIubYh6Rpnn7bZIXx3y/6zZSOQshOw/Ri1QjnREbYrV+4BTRj+ulFdG+/67Z6 4mVJoHC9FFMQ15jlfrlnYjeGtxamQQ737g6f/MIUZwnBhwZ+PTAVQ9rBOevF8W0MvNWa K7kQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1777902902; x=1778507702; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EtOd9wIvmtizVVlUV0Z3G/eI46M4pQxdkiteSTykGQo=; b=n6X/N3hQ7xdYRPDbm4viX69suQNLmeyaD4T1dpIT6WFt4giMlfmAC/8Roib3L1Z6kc SiWFyV+Ygm60g7dNacMqKC/sakWBwwRR5DIovOeXgUOmG3ccduCcS5jxy7FouDIF6F57 6t46MfjbsS4SNzCP0ZvRADwKEGYqwnqISzpX+GjEla982gCU2HgkcPWFg8IG0b0c/ze+ ZkupcqcvSLsX0snsPbFXBsNkGgtxNXtMo2XWaIQsQJUydjlxPFjGKlEOXgku77lsHkb8 kdlt1ApdnSu+CrIYvCk0nm0WJh4fHnzkAaasJldXZ0IQ/+bw0mi/ahgvropG6Dz+gmnT OtuQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ9fDnUSGvckQiGHjl9vZVTyfPnAKJveccXiZOgxusuaCXLsdK/2Aw5TsMmWPWF/nmFqUPkj63q6OY4QTZU=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yymp/17IYNRvBVBKqzjQ6gcYCUsYAFdfZT28XsHmWLCCdXjtSLi jfC8gpAajSTclvb7hYMCCEnn6Noe6h0Xm0zhY70d/vTpsex4D7WKVN9jPchWuXlwPiEXnnQoYjf uzn0T X-Gm-Gg: AeBDiesxwAsqNFM1+uOR79CNiw8uGR1I8a8kWGnMC62xhn11wtOIJNwoywPgXjD9pTv GzUyZyvYUObgH45/3sTit2Oh6KXDn/Zgo2BH3nXYEEJiijKnt3rUyjrMPFQn3xsp8wNTdOFVLwz iD2BHjrfyMD+rNqMTysowy9Aemy0dSZU4X1LZ6cjt5hjcihUheBMVeUjFQcO9WM7wI/U8WDgqVa HMgpRh0FXHPanpoyh89F2Pgc31sI3cvdEclPZaEVV4YQ5Q6h0oLx0SVXsO6JiQImTah+rM1KYph CNBzZzCcXGL5RgpBX5fgJAADdTkBqMeO5qmGc/KOoMRi/USojoo4zp76mu0Bd05Pj6hr0r9RXOh enePyi+IZtgqpLuvN2b1SaxJQbVx6DuEv31j5R3ZFFe/9Mjlz74QQIVaO0Yn0cTC8e0ZrmVGx7H DfwtuRpvzAPZ52Wa396KnYTVu4avfY40rTHYXbyzo5zjnKezcGfWc9gk9owY6EH74S7xtgTAz3h p8zxq+PayqtSHkwcppTq5F++Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:c058:b0:488:b99b:4177 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48a9866f1f4mr119701105e9.25.1777902901738; Mon, 04 May 2026 06:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (p200300f65f114e08197264a4bf9e813f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:f6:5f11:4e08:1972:64a4:bf9e:813f]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-48a82307f7csm339654125e9.12.2026.05.04.06.55.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 04 May 2026 06:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 15:55:00 +0200 From: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig_=28The_Capable_Hub=29?= To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Vinod Koul , Markus Schneider-Pargmann , Basavaraj Natikar , Frank Li , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Viresh Kumar , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: Consistently define pci_device_ids using named initializers Message-ID: References: <20260504102008.1996139-2-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="57vfqru4zafo4xdr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --57vfqru4zafo4xdr Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: Consistently define pci_device_ids using named initializers MIME-Version: 1.0 On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 01:29:12PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 12:20:06PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig (The Capable= Hub) wrote: > > The .driver_data member of the various struct pci_device_id arrays were > > initialized by list expressions. This isn't easily readable if you're > > not into PCI. Using named initializers is more explicit and thus easier > > to parse. Also skip explicit assignments of 0 (which the compiler then > > takes care of). > >=20 > > This change doesn't introduce changes to the compiled pci_device_id > > arrays. Tested on x86 and arm64. >=20 > HSU driver has different change ("Also" is a strong sign to the split req= uired). HSU is in the category "skip explicit assignments of 0", so I think that's fine. I could be talked into splitting if that's what is wanted. =20 > ... >=20 > > static const struct pci_device_id pch_dma_id_table[] =3D { > > - { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_EG20T_PCH_DMA_8CH), 8 }, > > - { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_EG20T_PCH_DMA_4CH), 4 }, > > - { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7213_DMA1_8CH), 8}, /* UART Video= */ > > - { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7213_DMA2_8CH), 8}, /* PCMIF SPI = */ > > - { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7213_DMA3_4CH), 4}, /* FPGA */ > > - { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7213_DMA4_12CH), 12}, /* I2S */ > > - { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7223_DMA1_4CH), 4}, /* UART */ > > - { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7223_DMA2_4CH), 4}, /* Video SPI = */ > > - { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7223_DMA3_4CH), 4}, /* Security */ > > - { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7223_DMA4_4CH), 4}, /* FPGA */ > > - { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7831_DMA1_8CH), 8}, /* UART */ > > - { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7831_DMA2_4CH), 4}, /* SPI */ > > - { 0, }, > > + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_EG20T_PCH_DMA_8CH), .driver_data = =3D 8 }, > > + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_EG20T_PCH_DMA_4CH), .driver_data = =3D 4 }, > > + { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7213_DMA1_8CH), .driver_data =3D = 8 }, /* UART Video */ > > + { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7213_DMA2_8CH), .driver_data =3D = 8 }, /* PCMIF SPI */ > > + { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7213_DMA3_4CH), .driver_data =3D = 4 }, /* FPGA */ > > + { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7213_DMA4_12CH), .driver_data =3D= 12 }, /* I2S */ > > + { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7223_DMA1_4CH), .driver_data =3D = 4 }, /* UART */ > > + { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7223_DMA2_4CH), .driver_data =3D = 4 }, /* Video SPI */ > > + { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7223_DMA3_4CH), .driver_data =3D = 4 }, /* Security */ > > + { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7223_DMA4_4CH), .driver_data =3D = 4 }, /* FPGA */ > > + { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7831_DMA1_8CH), .driver_data =3D = 8 }, /* UART */ > > + { PCI_VDEVICE(ROHM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ML7831_DMA2_4CH), .driver_data =3D = 4 }, /* SPI */ > > + { }, > > }; >=20 > Use PCI_DEVICE_DATA() instead. Same may apply to DesignWare, but one need= s to > define the device IDs. I think I may help with that. I'm not a fan of PCI_DEVICE_DATA. While it could indeed be used to shorten the assignments here, it's less readable in my opinion. Compare { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_EG20T_PCH_DMA_4CH), .driver_data =3D 4 = }, with { PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_EG20T_PCH_DMA_4CH, 4) }, =2E For someone who doesn't know what PCI_DEVICE_DATA does, the latter is less understandable. Also PCI_DEVICE_DATA has a cast which is something I want to get rid of. Best regards Uwe --57vfqru4zafo4xdr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEP4GsaTp6HlmJrf7Tj4D7WH0S/k4FAmn4pTEACgkQj4D7WH0S /k7zkQgApz70lV3E3UNybsOon9YUHk8ggPuHinq/44naNQ41FCWRSeFT4rZPL6LF i26D2z/Q9lyHS8jRIvPvMZtT5V3uCEjbDE1cz4Tze5pUEHW9DDqh8fAqI1ujNRu7 ZYSTSAwZeSR74vaR5Tgg6uKkjbF1U9dtvQE07hS1IzAX4auNBpG/2gNmqAR2648q 0BNPhyxPWNzmIIcqLE69p8ApN9MrjjMVUwhNj8rhVW8dGgLBE0njEvNGEX38pifb XVw/ebOzzxJLk8yURMLs1PHTqMVRczZp0R1Ax0I3azZ3T/XwC1pqkTmiWJb8U/qz /8/Uyk6n9hpW8OXhNHnhboUgrnYymA== =7ieQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --57vfqru4zafo4xdr--