From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>, Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/virt: Fix RCU lockdep splat in emergency virt callback path
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 10:48:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afjcCBGzuZU2iON9@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260503174534.45699-1-mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
On Sun, May 03, 2026, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
> x86_virt_invoke_kvm_emergency_callback() reaches rcu_dereference()
> through machine_crash_shutdown() with IRQs disabled but with RCU not
> necessarily watching, which triggers a suspicious RCU usage splat on
> debug kernels (CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y) during panic/kdump:
>
> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> arch/x86/virt/hw.c:52 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
> 1 lock held by tee/11119:
> #0: ffff8881fa32c440 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write
>
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl+0x84/0xd0
> lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x37/0x8f
> x86_virt_invoke_kvm_emergency_callback+0x5f/0x70
> x86_svm_emergency_disable_virtualization_cpu+0x2a/0x30
> x86_virt_emergency_disable_virtualization_cpu+0x6b/0x90
> native_machine_crash_shutdown+0x72/0x170
> __crash_kexec+0x137/0x280
> panic+0xce/0xd0
> sysrq_handle_crash+0x1f/0x20
> __handle_sysrq.cold+0x192/0x335
> write_sysrq_trigger+0x8c/0xc0
> proc_reg_write+0x1c3/0x3c0
> vfs_write+0x1d0/0xf80
> ksys_write+0x116/0x250
> do_syscall_64+0x11c/0x1480
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
> </TASK>
>
> The RCU usage is correct: writers
> (x86_virt_{register,unregister}_emergency_callback()) serialize via
> rcu_assign_pointer() + synchronize_rcu(), while the reader on the
> emergency path runs with IRQs disabled (the only caller is
> x86_virt_emergency_disable_virtualization_cpu(), which has
> lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled()), which is a valid classic-RCU read-side
> critical section.
>
> Use rcu_dereference_check() with irqs_disabled() to silence the splat
> without weakening the protection.
>
> Reproducible on a debug kernel (CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y, CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y)
> with kvm_amd or kvm_intel loaded by triggering kdump:
>
> echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger
>
> Fixes: 428afac5a8ea ("KVM: x86: Move bulk of emergency virtualizaton logic to virt subsystem")
> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/virt/hw.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/hw.c b/arch/x86/virt/hw.c
> index f647557d38ac..57eebc99299d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/hw.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/hw.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,13 @@ static void x86_virt_invoke_kvm_emergency_callback(void)
> {
> cpu_emergency_virt_cb *kvm_callback;
>
> - kvm_callback = rcu_dereference(kvm_emergency_callback);
> + /*
> + * Callers invoke this with IRQs disabled (see
> + * x86_virt_emergency_disable_virtualization_cpu()), which is a valid
> + * RCU read-side critical section. Tell lockdep so it doesn't complain
> + * during panic/reboot paths.
> + */
> + kvm_callback = rcu_dereference_check(kvm_emergency_callback, irqs_disabled());
This feels wrong. If RCU truly isn't watching this CPU, then isn't RCU allowed
to ignore this CPU when synchronizing?
> if (kvm_callback)
> kvm_callback();
> }
> --
> 2.54.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-04 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-03 17:45 [PATCH] x86/virt: Fix RCU lockdep splat in emergency virt callback path Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-05-04 17:48 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-05-04 18:50 ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-05-04 21:40 ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-05-04 23:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-04 23:54 ` [PATCH v2] x86/virt: Silence " Mikhail Gavrilov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afjcCBGzuZU2iON9@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox