public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>, Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Florent Revest <revest@google.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Matteo Rizzo <matteorizzo@google.com>,
	GONG Ruiqi <gongruiqi1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] slab: support for compiler-assisted type-based slab cache partitioning
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 23:22:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afkOMIPu1WNFE9MS@elver.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f2bd63a-dc02-4631-a3a5-7ec8e58a4a4e@kernel.org>

On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 03:03PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
> On 4/24/26 15:24, Marco Elver wrote:
> 
> > @@ -938,7 +968,7 @@ void *__kmalloc_large_node_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
> >   *	Try really hard to succeed the allocation but fail
> >   *	eventually.
> >   */
> > -static __always_inline __alloc_size(1) void *kmalloc_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> > +static __always_inline __alloc_size(1) void *_kmalloc_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t flags, kmalloc_token_t token)
> >  {
> >  	if (__builtin_constant_p(size) && size) {
> >  		unsigned int index;
> > @@ -948,14 +978,16 @@ static __always_inline __alloc_size(1) void *kmalloc_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t f
> >  
> >  		index = kmalloc_index(size);
> >  		return __kmalloc_cache_noprof(
> > -				kmalloc_caches[kmalloc_type(flags, _RET_IP_)][index],
> > +				kmalloc_caches[kmalloc_type(flags, token)][index],
> 
> While reviewing this, it occured to me we might have been using _RET_IP_
> here in a suboptimal way ever since this was introduced. Since this is all
> inlined, shouldn't have we been using _THIS_IP_ to really randomize using
> the kmalloc() callsite, and not its parent?
> 
> And after this patch, we get the token passed to _kmalloc_noprof()...
> 
> >  				flags, size);
> >  	}
> > -	return __kmalloc_noprof(size, flags);
> > +	return __kmalloc_noprof(PASS_KMALLOC_PARAMS(size, NULL, token), flags);
> 
> ... and used also here for the non-constant-size, where previously
> __kmalloc_noprof() (not inline function) would correctly use _RET_IP_ on its
> own ...
> 
> >  }
> > +#define kmalloc_noprof(...)			_kmalloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, __kmalloc_token(__VA_ARGS__))
> 
> ... and the token comes from here. With random partitioning that's
> #define __kmalloc_token(...) ((kmalloc_token_t){ .v = _RET_IP_ })
> 
> so that AFAIK makes the situation worse as now the cases without constant
> size also start randomizing by the parent callsite and not the kmalloc callsite.
> 
> But there are many users of __kmalloc_token() and maybe some are corrent in
> using _RET_IP_, I haven't checked, maybe we'll need two variants, or further
> change things around.

Good catch. I don't think we need multiple variants (otherwise the TYPED
variant would be broken) - we're moving token generation to the callers
(not even inlined anymore) with all this macro magic.

I think this is all we need:

--- a/include/linux/slab.h
+++ b/include/linux/slab.h
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ int kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *s);
 typedef struct { unsigned long v; } kmalloc_token_t;
 #ifdef CONFIG_KMALLOC_PARTITION_RANDOM
 extern unsigned long random_kmalloc_seed;
-#define __kmalloc_token(...) ((kmalloc_token_t){ .v = _RET_IP_ })
+#define __kmalloc_token(...) ((kmalloc_token_t){ .v = _THIS_IP_ })
 #elif defined(CONFIG_KMALLOC_PARTITION_TYPED)
 #define __kmalloc_token(...) ((kmalloc_token_t){ .v = __builtin_infer_alloc_token(__VA_ARGS__) })
 #endif

Plus a paragraph in the commit message.  Let me add that.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-04 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-24 13:24 [PATCH v3 1/2] slab: support for compiler-assisted type-based slab cache partitioning Marco Elver
2026-04-24 13:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] slab: fix kernel-docs for mm-api Marco Elver
2026-04-30 13:40   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-04-30 13:59     ` Marco Elver
2026-05-04 15:00       ` Marco Elver
2026-04-30 13:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] slab: support for compiler-assisted type-based slab cache partitioning Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-05-04 21:22   ` Marco Elver [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afkOMIPu1WNFE9MS@elver.google.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=gongruiqi1@huawei.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=matteorizzo@google.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=nsc@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=revest@google.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox