From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD923D0914; Tue, 5 May 2026 20:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778012027; cv=none; b=rpHJzt2XtKDbMlo+eSLrIrSeLvpHpv8QG12GbK5a1bssgYmT+XjRCh9V2A8HdTdoninaj6+O136bO71gQJ9tFcODe/BnMQmp3XhF99LKBnQLJJChKhdaG13xoYryVXDpS82QZQH6hzXMX878XMEaYoEB0SAZBCqEmCdaV9Od4sQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778012027; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ynAbCMg2qQJVXRYbA6ts9gqhSiOUCgGSYE0bBVHxnsc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=W1h7hujIIIi33fHe8yzsGR8BlRrUIDA2wL+nPgmLhoAzY+tYrSqI/fBgNag3f8brJnaBKOZB44i45qzlOjxioaJMp5j7prZeCU8On24y2Gt2oWzgLWbaM6OgVCkeetnLLP4gCqxn9BJ90ozhX3aZ8kHOwT/f7msPg6PRhtFICo4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b=VBmwRDCc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b="VBmwRDCc" Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A4C1BB0; Tue, 5 May 2026 13:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pluto (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C9383F763; Tue, 5 May 2026 13:13:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1778012023; bh=ynAbCMg2qQJVXRYbA6ts9gqhSiOUCgGSYE0bBVHxnsc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VBmwRDCc0L1cw4zLU+zTUNzgXz2NbrRwLCbgnkFP1rkdLhEqhpUNe7oxGqlaZeg2z vua1SsfGoEsgdqpKayF1Mawrc2PdTs5A6wBFXd6hxLDGKoQyUds2S0hFeq9gH7EIOP EZvyVz5Ggk2I1yb42cso9mRXhe/Qisi9iQ99JNco= Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 21:13:32 +0100 From: Cristian Marussi To: Philip Radford Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, etienne.carriere@st.com, peng.fan@oss.nxp.com, michal.simek@amd.com, quic_sibis@quicinc.com, dan.carpenter@linaro.org, d-gole@ti.com, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Extend powercap report to include MAI Message-ID: References: <20260428090922.346069-1-philip.radford@arm.com> <20260428090922.346069-7-philip.radford@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260428090922.346069-7-philip.radford@arm.com> On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 10:09:15AM +0100, Philip Radford wrote: > Extend scmi_powercap_meas_changed_report to include MAI change > notifications. > Hi > Signed-off-by: Philip Radford > --- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/powercap.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- > include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/powercap.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/powercap.c > index 1d1188e98d49..b9d50f4e8ae5 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/powercap.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/powercap.c > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include > > @@ -164,6 +165,7 @@ struct scmi_powercap_meas_changed_notify_payld { > __le32 agent_id; > __le32 domain_id; > __le32 power; > + __le32 mai; > }; > > struct scmi_msg_powercap_cpc { > @@ -1212,13 +1214,6 @@ static int scmi_powercap_notify(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, > if (ret) > return ret; > > - if (enable && !low && !high) { > - dev_err(ph->dev, > - "Invalid Measurements Notify thresholds: %u/%u\n", > - low, high); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > - Ok so you removed this check because now that a notification can be emitted even only to notify a MAI change, it is possible that the thresholds are zero and the notification will be emitted anyway due to a MAI change....BUT you have to review or completely remove the comment block that precedes this that says: /* * Note that we have to pick the most recently configured * thresholds to build a proper POWERCAP_MEASUREMENTS_NOTIFY * enable request and we fail, complaining, if no thresholds * were ever set, since this is an indication the API has been * used wrongly. */ ...becasue NOW is no more true and misleading, since you just removed the fail and complain part... It would be good to shortly explain in a comment the new possible scenarios in which notification can be enabled... > ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, message_id, > sizeof(*notify), 0, &t); > if (ret) > @@ -1333,14 +1328,23 @@ scmi_powercap_fill_custom_report(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, > { > const struct scmi_powercap_meas_changed_notify_payld *p = payld; > struct scmi_powercap_meas_changed_report *r = report; > + const size_t sz_v2 = offsetofend(struct scmi_powercap_meas_changed_notify_payld, > + power); > + const size_t sz_v3 = sizeof(*p); While this is a valid and nice construct, I think is overkill here since these offsets/sizes will never change at runtime.... ...you can just define above a couples of DEFINE that hardcodes the sizes of the v2 and v3 by using the #define SZ_V2 (sizeof(struct scmi_powercap_meas_changed_notify_payld)) and #define SZ_V3 (SZ_V2 - sizeof(__le32)) > > - if (sizeof(*p) != payld_sz) > + if (payld_sz != sz_v2 && payld_sz != sz_v3) > break; > > r->timestamp = timestamp; > r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id); > r->domain_id = le32_to_cpu(p->domain_id); > r->power = le32_to_cpu(p->power); maybe more clear to simply: r->mai = 0; if (payld_sz == SZ_V3 && PROTOCOL_REV_MAJOR(ph->version) >= 0x3) r->mai = le32_to_cpu(p->mai); > + > + if (payld_sz == sz_v3 && PROTOCOL_REV_MAJOR(ph->version) >= 0x3) > + r->mai = le32_to_cpu(p->mai); > + else > + r->mai = 0; > + > *src_id = r->domain_id; Thanks, Cristian