From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: Lei Chen <lei.chen@smartx.com>,
igor@gooddata.com, jan.cipa@gooddata.com,
jaroslav.pulchart@gooddata.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Rate-limit global clock updates on vCPU load
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 05:55:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afs6PJzU3rHZwGv3@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f1c742e0-41c1-4bdc-867c-a768a5eb89c5@leemhuis.info>
On Wed, May 06, 2026, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 4/9/26 21:21, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2026, Lei Chen wrote:
> >> commit 446fcce2a52b ("Revert "x86: kvm: rate-limit global clock updates"")
> >> dropped the rate limiting for KVM_REQ_GLOBAL_CLOCK_UPDATE.
> >>
> >> As a result, kvm_arch_vcpu_load() can queue global clock update requests
> >> every time a vCPU is scheduled when the master clock is disabled or when
> >> the vCPU is loaded for the first time.
> >>
> >> Restore the throttling with a per-VM ratelimit state and gate
> >> KVM_REQ_GLOBAL_CLOCK_UPDATE through __ratelimit(), so frequent vCPU
> >> scheduling does not generate a steady stream of redundant clock update
> >> requests.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 446fcce2a52b ("Revert "x86: kvm: rate-limit global clock updates"")
> >> Signed-off-by: Lei Chen <lei.chen@smartx.com>
> >> Reported-by: Jaroslav Pulchart <jaroslav.pulchart@gooddata.com>
> >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAK8fFZ5gY8_Mw2A=iZVFNVKQNrXQzVsn-HTd+Me9K6ZfmdgA+Q@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Was this performance regression ever addressed?
Nope, not yet.
> Looks like this fall through the cracks, but it's easy to miss something.
It's in my list of patches to apply (probably for 7.2?). I didn't want to squeeze
it into the initial 7.1 pull request for a variety of reasons.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-21 14:32 [REGRESSION 6.19, BISECTED] KVM: x86: kvmclock rate-limit removal causes IPI storm and high guest steal time Jaroslav Pulchart
2026-03-23 2:27 ` Lei Chen
2026-04-01 6:43 ` Lei Chen
2026-04-01 21:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-04-07 7:00 ` [PATCH v1] KVM: x86: Rate-limit global clock updates on vCPU load Lei Chen
2026-04-07 18:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-04-09 13:03 ` Lei Chen
2026-04-09 13:36 ` Lei Chen
2026-04-09 14:22 ` [PATCH v2] " Lei Chen
2026-04-09 19:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-06 9:48 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-05-06 12:55 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-05-06 14:09 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-05-06 15:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-06 15:58 ` Jaroslav Pulchart
2026-05-06 20:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-06 20:10 ` Jaroslav Pulchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afs6PJzU3rHZwGv3@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=igor@gooddata.com \
--cc=jan.cipa@gooddata.com \
--cc=jaroslav.pulchart@gooddata.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lei.chen@smartx.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox