From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05D5138735A; Wed, 6 May 2026 08:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778057307; cv=none; b=k/1GN6bAYKAtuxZHMeCLqulSqOHLG2tJAWYisTG/KTRJAPs/hBFy3p2s7AXmN9MPIR+jBS0GGIUEunlHXCoTPgpmNjDDS4B5AtL/ysdCV2KJNr5CEzIkHv9CMy5fzJV8rhsqBye/jj92dcIq9IyWR/sajX2rxsOlnygHL2CfGaw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778057307; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IUO5lXUDkT4nvUBviJejZvM9e4p1qGcE/fMZ5yRqht4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=G6jvbGtKQp+Wfu0pcWyazd7vxa9vQaxojJgrvMM0xfE6IWYNNN5/qnj9G0i2AoFrESIKE32J7zXoGFf/n8Wk3VOjFEj4wRwDzL28Rn/uMkQodyMxZ7bC0ruIo8jkxHYXq5RmmSXT355S4V6UOo1f8S98dvwm0uxULdsF8LLWpjY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=oyYTCfoL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oyYTCfoL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2A17C2BCC4; Wed, 6 May 2026 08:48:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778057306; bh=IUO5lXUDkT4nvUBviJejZvM9e4p1qGcE/fMZ5yRqht4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oyYTCfoLxt9bBadi2EzSMoURTPGCD/lKkFKebSQF7LnOtBPR7VpN5fo8iYNGExYVa pzOx4fSjkWAUmltCJw7h9vFz4ijQnMvAm1HfN1G3MPdgeGBbcpUuo3/7au0nR0YPik QP0PIXAdZ0urf5mL1ZHZpMfa3ImOrTwCrDGS6rGzzuXKml0O331yQiC2f/f/zdkqUb icnkpvTei2+s4rP+rPmBhJDOyhpeHek2fYHa5d41MUUvOCZVLneiy8qWgxAQTW/q3p aDLeYpf2toLXyU3+GN4x4R8CHJovyT4t6/+1ytZyodVy0KkHqIds6KcxOgk8aI6cBi YCO2FlL2Ct/SA== Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 10:48:20 +0200 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Sunil V L , Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Anup Patel , Hanjun Guo , Sudeep Holla , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic-v5: Add IWB to ACPI probe dependency control Message-ID: References: <20260505-gic-v5-acpi-iwb-probe-deferral-v1-0-b37b85998362@kernel.org> <20260505-gic-v5-acpi-iwb-probe-deferral-v1-2-b37b85998362@kernel.org> <875x51y6gi.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <875x51y6gi.ffs@tglx> On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 09:58:05PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, May 05 2026 at 10:48, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > On Arm GICv5 systems, wired IRQs routed to an IWB may require resolving > > S/IRQs/interrupts/g > > Changelogs are prose and not an acronym dump ground. > > > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++--- > > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 + > > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-iwb.c | 5 +++++ > > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5.c | 13 +++++++++++-- > > include/linux/acpi_iort.h | 3 ++- > > I'm confused about the conglomerate of files affected by an irqchip > change... True, I can split the ACPI changes into a separate patch though on its own it would not be that useful because the resulting code would have no user - I will do what you and Rafael prefer. Thanks, Lorenzo > Thanks, > > tglx