From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39B053C1995; Thu, 7 May 2026 09:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778146028; cv=none; b=ZJ6v9gi+XSjHtCcjcW9hEsUadKuAmVW3zcECWEINP0jhaLP4bp4F86FY9C+NW3yNBSW85/wSC20xve+EjtbygSgv3M/3glSkBlSVr5I33Ekz+LGMk6s4T7o+RGaztmdaPgvZG+cgvNi2oQh6SRskhtOoDseGqZiZfZ9DquyZBTs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778146028; c=relaxed/simple; bh=H1j3rZjckUfWY1oU8ov27ak1n4fQcf7tTaqPvuxAc7g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Jc2vZsgQA3sO3/njW9ysM/AOxTSiWYPZMRA9aOpHX/AhAx9Q9/SpMlW0C8GsnrbkwLN5Ydsbhhq3OW4yntw5zjcY1yOP9nxKNXd5B/OEOI4QsXkE3oGN+vR8AHVzifrg33qDfGKukDEukiWIVcOZ6MhSpmgUJ/xWl5cgeHxHcwE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=KtaScGdk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="KtaScGdk" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1778146026; x=1809682026; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=H1j3rZjckUfWY1oU8ov27ak1n4fQcf7tTaqPvuxAc7g=; b=KtaScGdkSFiILHYB7rhPT7y+YQZDGSnYhl2oHqXvQ+ap7V6Uu60SA1E+ pHoSJAugGFpDImcTBno9vUtYv1TcjSmw4245qhTlogMsIF7x07f3548a/ 55jj2SBCK7eiwu9Ne9cKKFk0wUxVZW5sCgZa0Vxy4T8gb3GQ0nd9ZtIB1 yVn4JJQoNCTu9DWMtTft3YTG6q9FYC47sidN0uLG9n3KNHnnJjTxFY4wJ aIflaxxkozHcWKHGj/kUVA5GqN2ybfEcY4AOnxwkfMxhi0d4KHuKe73KM g7Gj2e65/c2gVy9uzXeHS7JfKwS9NynkUd79IPb/6g7vn15dJIfRPMgDO w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 4v2UArn+SbOXZQhUiptcNg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: joJwltodQD6sGe9V6DrhEg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11778"; a="90547362" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,221,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="90547362" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 May 2026 02:27:06 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: UnWxH9i8SvSZpuW58v9Ccw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8rbZim2dSkutdIKs2aRo6Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,221,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="236675054" Received: from vpanait-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.149]) by orviesa007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 May 2026 02:27:01 -0700 Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 12:26:58 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Herbert Xu Cc: Lukas Wunner , "David S. Miller" , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , Andrey Ryabinin , Ignat Korchagin , Stefan Berger , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Alexander Potapenko , Andrey Konovalov , Dmitry Vyukov , Vincenzo Frascino , Eric Biggers , Nathan Chancellor , David Laight , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Ard Biesheuvel Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: ecc - Unbreak the build on arm with CONFIG_KASAN_STACK=y Message-ID: References: <7e3d64a53efb28740b32d1f934e78c10086208ab.1778073318.git.lukas@wunner.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 12:26:10PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 03:27:49PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > > > Changes v1 -> v2: > > * s/ARCH/CONFIG_ARM/, s/LLVM/CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC/ (Nathan) > > * Add link to gcc bugzilla entry > > * Rewrite commit message to include feedback provided by gcc maintainers > > and explain high stack usage with algorithm choice > > > > Link to v1: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/abfaede9ab2e963d784fb70598ed74935f7f8d93.1775628469.git.lukas@wunner.de/ > > > > crypto/Makefile | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > Sorry but v1 has already been applied. Does it make sense to revert and apply v2? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko