From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com,
rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, fengchengwen@huawei.com,
chenl311@chinatelecom.cn, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
timothy.hayes@arm.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
mrigendra.chaubey@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de,
sudeep.holla@kernel.org, yangyicong@hisilicon.com,
jic23@kernel.org, pierre.gondois@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpu/hotplug: Fix NULL kobject warning in cpuhp_smt_enable()
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 10:55:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agGnonc5n64ct72T@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54093ddf-e237-4cc0-9fe1-2989916c1f72@huawei.com>
On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 11:17:43AM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> On 4/27/2026 10:35 AM, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> > On arm64, when booting with `maxcpus` greater than the number of present
> > CPUs (e.g., QEMU -smp cpus=4,maxcpus=8), some CPUs are marked as 'present'
> > but have not yet been registered via register_cpu(). Consequently,
> > the per-cpu device objects for these CPUs are not yet initialized.
> >
> > In cpuhp_smt_enable(), the code iterates over all present CPUs. Calling
> > _cpu_up() for these unregistered CPUs eventually leads to
> > sysfs_create_group() being called with a NULL kobject (or a kobject
> > without a directory), triggering the following warning in
> > fs/sysfs/group.c:
> >
> > if (WARN_ON(!kobj || (!update && !kobj->sd)))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > When booting with ACPI, arm64 smp_prepare_cpus() currently sets all
> > enumerated CPUs as "present" regardless of their status in the MADT. This
> > causes issues with SMT hotplug control. For instance, with QEMU's
> > "-smp 4,maxcpus=8" configuration, the MADT GICC entries are populated as
> > follows: the first four CPUs are marked Enabled while the remaining four
> > are marked Online Capable to support potential hot-plugging.
> >
> > Fix this by:
> >
> > 1. When booting with ACPI, checking the ACPI_MADT_ENABLED flag in the GICC
> > entry before calling set_cpu_present() during SMP initialization.
> >
> > 2. Properly managing the present mask in acpi_map_cpu() and
> > acpi_unmap_cpu() to support actual CPU hotplug events, This aligns with
> > other architectures like x86 and LoongArch.
> >
> > This ensures that only physically available or explicitly enabled CPUs
> > are in the present mask, keeping the SMT control logic consistent with
> > the actual hardware state.
> >
> > How to reproduce:
> >
> > 1. echo off > /sys/devices/system/cpu/smt/control
> > psci: CPU1 killed (polled 0 ms)
> > psci: CPU3 killed (polled 0 ms)
> >
> > 2. echo 2 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/smt/control
> >
> > Detected PIPT I-cache on CPU1
> > GICv3: CPU1: found redistributor 1 region 0:0x00000000080c0000
> > CPU1: Booted secondary processor 0x0000000001 [0x410fd082]
> > Detected PIPT I-cache on CPU3
> > GICv3: CPU3: found redistributor 3 region 0:0x0000000008100000
> > CPU3: Booted secondary processor 0x0000000003 [0x410fd082]
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > WARNING: fs/sysfs/group.c:137 at internal_create_group+0x41c/0x4bc, CPU#2: sh/181
> > Modules linked in:
> > CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 181 Comm: sh Not tainted 7.0.0-rc1-00010-g8d13386c7624 #142 PREEMPT
> > Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
> > pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> > pc : internal_create_group+0x41c/0x4bc
> > lr : sysfs_create_group+0x18/0x24
> > sp : ffff80008078ba40
> > x29: ffff80008078ba40 x28: ffff296c980ad000 x27: ffff00007fb94128
> > x26: 0000000000000054 x25: ffffd693e845f3f0 x24: 0000000000000001
> > x23: 0000000000000001 x22: 0000000000000004 x21: 0000000000000000
> > x20: ffffd693e845fc10 x19: 0000000000000004 x18: 00000000ffffffff
> > x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000
> > x14: 0000000000000358 x13: 0000000000000007 x12: 0000000000000350
> > x11: 0000000000000008 x10: 0000000000000407 x9 : 0000000000000400
> > x8 : ffff00007fbf3b60 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffffd693e845f3f0
> > x5 : ffff00007fb94128 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : ffff000000f4eac0
> > x2 : ffffd693e7095a08 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000
> > Call trace:
> > internal_create_group+0x41c/0x4bc (P)
> > sysfs_create_group+0x18/0x24
> > topology_add_dev+0x1c/0x28
> > cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x104/0x20c
> > __cpuhp_invoke_callback_range+0x94/0x11c
> > _cpu_up+0x200/0x37c
> > cpuhp_smt_enable+0xbc/0x114
> > control_store+0xe8/0x1d4
> > dev_attr_store+0x18/0x2c
> > sysfs_kf_write+0x7c/0x94
> > kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x128/0x1b8
> > vfs_write+0x2b0/0x354
> > ksys_write+0x68/0xfc
> > __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28
> > invoke_syscall+0x48/0x10c
> > el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe8
> > do_el0_svc+0x20/0x2c
> > el0_svc+0x34/0x124
> > el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa0/0xe4
> > el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c
> > ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>
> Hi, just a gentle ping on this v2 patch. It’s been about two weeks, and
> I was wondering if there are any further comments or if there's anything
> else I should address? Thanks!
No comments from me but I'd like James Morse to review, in case he
recalls the decisions made at the time. I think Jonathan already said
that he doesn't fully remember.
Given that it's just a warning rather than some kernel panic, I'm happy
to wait until the upcoming merging window (for 7.2). In the meantime:
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260427023507.1247418-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2026-05-11 3:17 ` [PATCH v2] cpu/hotplug: Fix NULL kobject warning in cpuhp_smt_enable() Jinjie Ruan
2026-05-11 9:55 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2026-05-11 17:37 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agGnonc5n64ct72T@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mrigendra.chaubey@gmail.com \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=timothy.hayes@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox