The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org,  "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	 Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
	 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@igalia.com>,
	kernel-dev@igalia.com,
	 syzbot+208f7f3e5f59c11aeb90@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] KVM: x86/xen: Remove unnecessary irqsave from GPC lock usage in xen.c
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 09:51:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <agII-2_f_gYMdPzL@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508181717.3230988-5-dwmw2@infradead.org>

On Fri, May 08, 2026, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
> 
> Now that the hardirq path (xen_timer_callback and set_evtchn_fast) uses
> read_trylock() instead of read_lock_irqsave(), the remaining GPC lock
> users in xen.c are only called from process context (vcpu_run, ioctls).
> There is no need to disable interrupts to prevent concurrent access from
> a hardirq user, since the hardirq path no longer takes the lock.

No longer _waits_ on the lock, correct?  I.e. the hardirq path can still take the
lock, but only ever does so using trylock.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-11 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-08 18:10 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: x86/xen: Fix Xen / GPC / PREEMPT_RT issues with rwlock_t David Woodhouse
2026-05-08 18:10 ` [PATCH 1/7] locking/rt: Use raw_spin_lock_irqsave() in __rwbase_read_unlock() David Woodhouse
2026-05-08 18:10 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: x86: Use gfn_to_pfn_cache for record_steal_time David Woodhouse
2026-05-08 18:10 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: x86/xen: Use read_trylock() for GPC locks in hardirq/atomic paths David Woodhouse
2026-05-08 18:10 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: x86/xen: Remove unnecessary irqsave from GPC lock usage in xen.c David Woodhouse
2026-05-11 16:51   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-05-11 16:54     ` David Woodhouse
2026-05-11 17:48       ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-11 18:12         ` David Woodhouse
2026-05-08 18:10 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: x86: Remove unnecessary irqsave from kvm_setup_guest_pvclock() David Woodhouse
2026-05-08 18:10 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: Remove unnecessary IRQ disabling from GPC lock in pfncache.c David Woodhouse
2026-05-08 18:10 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: x86/xen: Handle pending Xen timer events in vcpu_enter_guest() David Woodhouse
2026-05-09  7:27   ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=agII-2_f_gYMdPzL@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mfo@igalia.com \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=syzbot+208f7f3e5f59c11aeb90@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox