From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 635A847D95B; Tue, 12 May 2026 09:12:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778577137; cv=none; b=kBCmli9p1W8tdIe1MmsdrBszEe9BAEokbSH0ZkzuImWO9QF1DnxwifY3yw8JTiqq8PMuVBkAs6AB8z7Mwu8vfsqai56DEUcuz+kOcA9ypnnN3KZl0clup1pbRAnXWQbqGurtInNcDu6+HW+J27Bwab87lPIcK5ftc/gRHZS3kjk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778577137; c=relaxed/simple; bh=w9wYw2xLVzUmGJHMmQSpQbDGu4EJPRwUSBPQHpG7BXc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sxXXK96kzzdM8g93MCvpTV1lhzkmWSXzJAJ+6s+nQ0lOvPjyXYToJq9rmpJhE5yYMu0q3Sq+KKSGsw8nUYvS8RhJe1wHc52bPwAq/YSuNaUCFclsDot8QItjr0jqXlfBz74CZ0wwb31Pxecv2Qxu+cFk2xKrkxqEkWNe1x/Gn+s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=hAIxqnml; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hAIxqnml" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1778577136; x=1810113136; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=w9wYw2xLVzUmGJHMmQSpQbDGu4EJPRwUSBPQHpG7BXc=; b=hAIxqnmlACGY3EJy4Ek9Fe/xo+2MSQsHJmR51oAtZmR0pecTnmJsr9gc pBlUPBdDxhNjAqhN4sAe/Cqjm+NHfSbXnkbvXPAPj9EvLVudDimLtXZad RjvK0Q1ARlV5QYqRi5sWDU4xJEgE2Of3YGWk0vAzxGs6vcT6SWoxDykce eklF09zHZHx5hYvXlOJlafKeWgYpZbruhfX4EYAp3s8H2ZREKn2Yu3vnF Iwu07ujSEv2yRO+ofsOMTdiz3QDR3/4DdLqtqbrp5opbOwop1u8IE9TgR UiTcAvrTED+hcGQMjJA/bwLrV+6HsEfJQW93j8kBOe8OT0R+zeEn6NsWD g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: dOBYoOjQRK2dJl6XSobULQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 30ucSZ+3T6OA4uFkZRC7Ow== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11783"; a="79429091" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,230,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="79429091" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 May 2026 02:12:16 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 17CbI0i7Spm5u1gYxWzqPw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: diALgUxFQ+6mZdE71Y6C8w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,230,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="242711308" Received: from kniemiec-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.112]) by orviesa005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 May 2026 02:12:14 -0700 Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 12:12:11 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: joshua.crofts1@gmail.com Cc: Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] iio: magnetometer: ak8975: driver cleanup Message-ID: References: <20260511-magnetometer-fixes-post-pickup-v7-0-9d910faa28b6@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260511-magnetometer-fixes-post-pickup-v7-0-9d910faa28b6@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Joshua Crofts via B4 Relay wrote: > This series is a continuation of the previous ak8975 driver cleanup > effort, as most of the patches were picked. > > Changes include: > - using BIT() and GENMASK() macros > - moving to devm_* resource management > - adding a scan index enum > - moving from using wait loops to iopoll functions > - various code style changes Thanks for doing this! Jonathan, the same Q I had in previous version round, can we get some patches applied to reduce the burden of the series? (I think of 1, 2, 7, 8 and might be more.) As for the series, I think if this version is still not good enough (patch 3) we need to rearrange it so that patch is going to the end (as much as possible) of the series, so we want delay the 'good' ones to be applied. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko