The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: ackerleytng@google.com
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	fvdl@google.com, jiaqiyan@google.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com,
	jthoughton@google.com, mhocko@kernel.org, michael.roth@amd.com,
	pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, pratyush@kernel.org,
	rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, rientjes@google.com,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com,
	shakeel.butt@linux.dev, shivankg@amd.com, vannapurve@google.com,
	yan.y.zhao@intel.com, Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Open HugeTLB allocation routine for more generic use
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 15:17:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <agMohIaXKLlBKM6A@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260506-hugetlb-open-up-v2-0-826a0c5f28fc@google.com>

On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 08:54:36AM -0700, Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The motivation for this patch series is guest_memfd, which would like
> to use HugeTLB as a generic source of huge pages but not adopt
> HugeTLB's reservation at mmap() time.
> 
> By refactoring alloc_hugetlb_folio() and some dependent functions,
> there is now an option to allocate HugeTLB folios without providing a
> VMA. Specifically, HugeTLB allocation used to be dependent on the VMA
> to
> 
> 1. Look up reservations in the resv_map
> 2. Get mpol, stored at vma->vm_policy
> 
> This refactoring provides hugetlb_alloc_folio(), which focuses on just
> the allocation itself, and associated memory and HugeTLB charging
> (cgroups). alloc_hugetlb_folio() still handles reservations in the
> resv_map and subpools.
> 
> Regarding naming, I'm definitely open to alternative names :) I chose
> hugetlb_alloc_folio() because I'm seeing this function as a general
> allocation function that is provided by the HugeTLB subsystem (hence
> the hugetlb_ prefix). I'm intending for alloc_hugetlb_folio() to be
> later refactored as a static function for use just by HugeTLB, and
> HugeTLBfs should probably use hugetlb_alloc_folio() directly.
> 
> To see how hugetlb_alloc_folio() is used by guest_memfd, the most
> recent patch series that uses this more generic HugeTLB allocation
> routine is at [1], and a newer revision of that patch series is at
> [2].

Would that be

https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1747264138.git.ackerleytng@google.com/T/#me2152fa2cc79d651ecea7a2bce8b57725fb57465

?


-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-12 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-06 15:54 [PATCH v2 0/6] Open HugeTLB allocation routine for more generic use Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-05-06 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] mm: hugetlb: Consolidate interpretation of gbl_chg within alloc_hugetlb_folio() Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-05-12  9:00   ` Oscar Salvador
2026-05-06 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] mm: hugetlb: Move mpol interpretation out of alloc_buddy_hugetlb_folio_with_mpol() Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-05-12 12:51   ` Oscar Salvador
2026-05-06 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] mm: hugetlb: Move mpol interpretation out of dequeue_hugetlb_folio_vma() Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-05-12 12:56   ` Oscar Salvador
2026-05-06 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] mm: hugetlb: Use error variable in alloc_hugetlb_folio Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-05-06 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] mm: hugetlb: Move mem_cgroup_charge_hugetlb() earlier in allocation Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-05-06 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] mm: hugetlb: Refactor out hugetlb_alloc_folio() Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-05-12 13:25   ` Oscar Salvador
2026-05-12 13:17 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=agMohIaXKLlBKM6A@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=djbw@kernel.org \
    --cc=fvdl@google.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jiaqiyan@google.com \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=jthoughton@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=shivankg@amd.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox