From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Fix FD double-close in kvm_vm_release()
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 06:30:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agMqc7Zub3fqToxp@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+EHjTxDvkDGyd-uyAqW7ErVxcKnUBpCYAgmnYfCdh+CCSq=3g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 12, 2026, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2026 at 21:25, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> > > I used kvm_vm_release() because it's the only public API that closes
> > > vm->fd to trigger kernel-side destruction. But the existing callers
> > > follow it with vm_recreate_with_one_vcpu(), so the "release + later
> > > kvm_vm_free()" path isn't exercised today.
> > >
> > > I see three ways to make this clean:
> > > a) This patch: kvm_vm_release() becomes idempotent for its three
> > > FDs, matching the kvm_stats_release() idiom it already invokes.
> > > b) Leave kvm_vm_release() as-is and add a dedicated helper, e.g.
> > > kvm_vm_destroy_kernel(), that closes vm->fd to trigger kernel
> > > destruction while leaving the kvm_vm struct intact for
> > > post-destruction inspection. kvm_vm_free() learns to handle the
> > > half-released state.
> > > c) Something else entirely, e.g., the test should manage vm->fd
> > > directly and not rely on library helpers for this pattern.
> >
> > d) Fully kill the VM; validate the semantics with an explict mmap().
> >
> > The entire point of the test you are writing is to verfiy that a guest_memfd VMA
> > doesn't somehow cause KVM to leak state. So, make that obvious instead of abusing
> > APIs that kinda sorta do what you want, but not really.
> >
> > mem = kvm_mmap(region->mmap_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED,
> > region->guest_memfd);
> >
> > ...
> >
> > kvm_vm_free(vm);
> >
> > TEST_ASSERT(is_zero(mem, ...));
>
> The test isn't about guest_memfd. The pKVM support that just landed
> via Will's series [1]
Landed where? Is pKVM actually going upstream with anonymous memory? I thought
the inability to protect against page faults in the untrusted kernel was a
non-starter?
> kvm_mmap() + kvm_vm_free() + is_zero() doesn't translate here. The only
> host view of the donated pages is the memslot mmap, and kvm_vm_free()
> munmaps it on the way out, so inspection has to happen between
> kernel-side destruction and userspace free. kvm_vm_release() is the
> only library primitive that does that today.
>
> What do you suggest?
Manually allocate the memory and expose it to the guest via
vm_set_user_memory_region2() vm_set_user_memory_region().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 11:37 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: selftests: Fixes for guest_memfd_test and FD double-close Fuad Tabba
2026-05-11 11:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: Fix MADV_COLLAPSE build failure on older toolchains Fuad Tabba
2026-05-11 14:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-11 11:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Fix FD double-close in kvm_vm_release() Fuad Tabba
2026-05-11 14:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-11 15:19 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-05-11 20:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-12 8:06 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-05-12 13:30 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-05-12 15:04 ` Will Deacon
2026-05-12 15:06 ` Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agMqc7Zub3fqToxp@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox